[ALAC] EPDP Early input

[Alan Greenberg]

I can only give you my opinion. I cannot say 
whether our position is identical to that of 
SSAC, but I cannot see anything in that document 
that I do not believe is in support of our needs. 
I do not think that we have the bacndwidth to 
work from scratch at the moment, and in a timely 
manner. Voicing support for this report was a 
quick action that I believed we could take without compromising our position.

I would be interested in understanding what we do 
not agree with and we could certainly add those caveats if there was agreement.

And thank you for jumping in!  :-)

Alan

At 28/08/2018 05:09 AM, Joanna Kulesza wrote:

>Thank you Alan and Andrei for the updates.
>
>Please excuse my newcomer confusion - not 
>meaning to stir the pot here - but I'm wondering 
>how close At-Large's/ALAC's position is to that 
>of the SSAC? Do we agree with their report 100%? 
>My initial thinking is that representing users, 
>we might want a somewhat more diversified 
>approach than that offered by the SSAC, ensuring 
>full GDPR compliance (I'm happy to elaborate if 
>needed). Also, would it make sense to take on 
>the positions of other communities in our 
>statement, if only for the sake of future 
>consensus building? As already briefly mentioned 
>to Alan, I'm happy to help with the drafting if needed.
>
>Best to all,
>Joanna Kulesza
>--------------------------------
>Joanna Kulesza, PhD
>assistant professor of international law and Internet governance
>Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz
>Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland
>publications: 
><https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/>https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/
>website: 
><https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna>https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna
>
>wt., 28 sie 2018 o 08:27 Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> napisał(a):
>As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just 
>completed, all EPDP participant groups have been 
>given the opportunity to provide "early input" into the EPDP.
>So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their 
>input can be found at 
><https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ>https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ.
>The SSAC's input consisted of their recent 
>report SAC101. A copy is attached for your convenience.
>I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a 
>statement saying that we support SAC101, as it 
>is in line with our stated position of trying to 
>ensure that security professionals and law 
>enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
>I open the floor for discussion and will 
>initiate a Consensus Call later in the week.
>Alan
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180828/d3f10e5b/attachment.html>