[ALAC] [Alac-sc-outreach] Fwd: [ICANN60_Onboarding] Call for ICANN61 Nominations
Eduardo Diaz
eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com
Fri Nov 24 16:18:28 UTC 2017
Tijani:
I agree with your concern.
Many question to answer and title time to do so. I expect a good outcome
from these discussions.
Regards,
-ed
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:15 AM Tijani BEN JEMAA <
tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn> wrote:
> Dear Eduardo,
>
> I love your many cents….. lol.
>
> I have a problem with the overall conception of the COP since I don’t feel
> we don’t all have the same understanding:
> To be efficient, how long should the program last for each mentee????
> Shall it be continuous for each mentee????
> Do we have the ability to take the travel support of the mentor and give
> it to another mentee????
> Is it important to have more mentees with shorter mentoring period and
> less F2F meeting attended????
>
> To set the scene for our discussion next Tuesday, we need these question
> answered and agreed on by all our members.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114>
> +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 24 nov. 2017 à 14:17, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> Seun et al:
>
> I propose the following:
>
> *For travel slots: *
>
> 1. The program mentor should be selected from within
> the
> funded ALAC members and RALO officers
> pool
> . If we do this there will be one additional travel spot for each meeting
> since these two sets are currently funded.
> This will cover the second travel slot for each meeting.
>
> *For Mentors/Mentees: *
>
> 1. Ratio: One Mentor to 6 Mentees
> 1. One Mentor selected for a 3 meeting period. Selection to occur
> after the AGM for each cycle.
> No term limited.
> -
> Two Mentees selected for a 3 meeting period. Selection to occur
> after the Annual General Meeting (AGM). Term Limited.
> -
> Six
> distinctive
>
> Mentees
> to be selected using a round-robin scheme with regional balance
> as follows:
> - One Mentee to be from the region where the meeting is held
>
> - The second to be selected using the following algorithm:
> - With five regions: A,B,C,D & E where the meeting is held on a
> rotational scheme, the second Mentee may be selected as follows:
> - Mentee #1 | Mentee #2
> - A | D
> - B | E
> - C | A
> - D | B
> - E | C
>
>
> *For nominations to the program:*
>
>
> 1. **Before each AGM, each RALO nominates their Mentor/Mentee**s and
> sends recommendation to *ALAC and the ALAC Appointee Selection
> Committee
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Subcommittee+on+Appointee+Selection> * (AASC)
> for Mentees' final approval. This to happen before the end of the AGM.
>
> 2. ALAC nominates their Mentor and sends to AASC for Mentor's final
> selection from the RALOs and ALAC pool of nominations. This to happen after
> the AGM.
> 3. AASC selects final slate and sends it to the Community Onboarding
> Pilot Program (COPP) Program manager for final approval.
>
>
> My many cents.
>
> -ed
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 12:23 AM Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Eduardo,
>>
>> I guess that is exactly what this thread is intended to achieve. Olivier
>> is taking us through the process of finalising on this and am sure those
>> information required by your RALO will be made available.
>> It may be good to know though if you (or your RALO) supports the process
>> proposed by Olivier.
>>
>> As your question about how staff selects final slate, u stand to be
>> corrected but I think it's each community that finalizes their slate and
>> sends to staff; staff will not do the selection and I also don't think they
>> will reject candidates recommended by the respective community.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sent from my mobile
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2017 12:57 AM, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> NARALO needs to know the process as to how people get nominated to this
>>> program and once they are nominated, who and how in ALAC selects its
>>> nominees and then who and how in the Onboarding Staff selects the final
>>> slate of mentors/mentees.
>>>
>>> -ed
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <
>>> tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Olivier.
>>>>
>>>> I think this issue should be on the agenda of the upcoming ALAC meeting
>>>> (Tuesday 28 November).
>>>> I hope that all ALAC members will come to the call with their remarks
>>>> on Olivier’s proposal and any other proposal they may have so that it will
>>>> be a venue of reflection, but selection of the best proposal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>>> Executive Director
>>>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>>>> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114>
>>>> +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 23 nov. 2017 à 16:10, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> on the process to select mentors/mentees.
>>>>
>>>> On 22/11/2017 00:01, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ALAC Selection Committee?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SO: I think this group are used to reviewing and selecting such
>>>> non-RALO centric positions and may be in a better place to perform this
>>>> task.
>>>>
>>>> Overall my suggestion is to push this to the ASC.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Recognising it was an excellent idea I shared this with the ALT
>>>> yesterday and this idea has received support.
>>>>
>>>> Today I had a call with Beran Dondeh Gillen, one of this past year's
>>>> Mentees. She, along with Isaac Maposa, were mentored by Dev Anand
>>>> Teelucksingh and put together a proposal for a follow-up to the mentoring
>>>> program. This proposal was that in the next cycle, five people from
>>>> At-Large should be mentored, one from each RALO.
>>>>
>>>> With the news that only 1 mentee & 1 mentor would be funded,
>>>> specifically in the lead up to the next ICANN meeting, with 1 other mentee
>>>> that would need to be funded by other means, the concept of having 5
>>>> mentees sounded as though not possible. Heidi asked Ergys Ramaj about
>>>> having 5 mentees funded, one for each region. That was categorically
>>>> refused as there isn't the funding to do this, this year.
>>>>
>>>> So Beran suggested a version of the proposed plan:
>>>>
>>>> - 5 mentees, to be proposed by each RALO, but actually selected, one
>>>> per region, by the ALAC Selection Committee.
>>>> - 1 mentor selected from a slate of applicants, by the ALAC Selection
>>>> Committee
>>>>
>>>> The mentor starts mentoring all 5 mentees through a set of calls
>>>> throughout the year, with the 5 mentees. The mentor travels to each of the
>>>> ICANN meetings in the year.
>>>> With 3 ICANN meetings in a year, 2 mentees go to March meeting. 2
>>>> mentees go to June meeting. 1 mentee goes to AGM in November. Thus, all 5
>>>> mentees have had a chance to attend one funded ICANN meeting. This means
>>>> there is actually a shortfall of only 2 travel slots, one at the March
>>>> meeting and one at the June meeting. As the focus for mentoring is about
>>>> policy, one slot for each of these two meetings could be a discretionary
>>>> slot current available for a policy person to take part in the meeting.
>>>>
>>>> This is just a simple proposal - Feedback/Comments welcome as soon as
>>>> possible! We need to have finalised a process by the end of this week.
>>>>
>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ALAC mailing list
>>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>>
>>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ALAC mailing list
>>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>>
>>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential
>>> and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
>>> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
>>> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
>>> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20171124/9bf401fc/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list