[ALAC] [Alac-sc-outreach] Fwd: [ICANN60_Onboarding] Call for ICANN61 Nominations

Fri Nov 24 04:23:51 UTC 2017

Hello Eduardo,

I guess that is exactly what this thread is intended to achieve. Olivier is
taking us through the process of finalising on this and am sure those
information required by your RALO will be made available.
It may be good to know though if you (or your RALO) supports the process
proposed by Olivier.

As  your question about how staff selects final slate, u stand to be
corrected but I think it's each community that finalizes their slate and
sends to staff; staff will not do the selection and I also don't think they
will reject candidates recommended by the respective community.

Regards
Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Nov 24, 2017 12:57 AM, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
wrote:

> NARALO needs to know the process as to how people get nominated to this
> program and once they are nominated, who and how in ALAC  selects its
> nominees and then who and how in the Onboarding Staff selects the final
> slate of mentors/mentees.
>
> -ed
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <
> tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Olivier.
>>
>> I think this issue should be on the agenda of the upcoming ALAC meeting
>> (Tuesday 28 November).
>> I hope that all ALAC members will come to the call with their remarks on
>> Olivier’s proposal and any other proposal they may have so that it will be
>> a venue of reflection, but selection of the best proposal.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------
>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>> Executive Director
>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>> Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114>
>>             +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------
>>
>>
>> Le 23 nov. 2017 à 16:10, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> a écrit
>> :
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> on the process to select mentors/mentees.
>>
>> On 22/11/2017 00:01, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> ALAC Selection Committee?
>>
>>
>> SO: I think this group are used to reviewing and selecting such non-RALO
>> centric positions and may be in a better place to perform this task.
>>
>> Overall my suggestion is to push this to the ASC.
>>
>>
>> Recognising it was an excellent idea I shared this with the ALT yesterday
>> and this idea has received support.
>>
>> Today I had a call with Beran Dondeh Gillen, one of this past year's
>> Mentees. She, along with Isaac Maposa, were mentored by Dev Anand
>> Teelucksingh and put together a proposal for a follow-up to the mentoring
>> program. This proposal was that in the next cycle, five people from
>> At-Large should be mentored, one from each RALO.
>>
>> With the news that only 1 mentee & 1 mentor would be funded, specifically
>> in the lead up to the next ICANN meeting, with 1 other mentee that  would
>> need to be funded by other means, the concept of having 5 mentees sounded
>> as though not possible. Heidi asked Ergys Ramaj about having 5 mentees
>> funded, one for each region. That was categorically refused as there isn't
>> the funding to do this, this year.
>>
>> So Beran suggested a version of the proposed plan:
>>
>> - 5 mentees, to be proposed by each RALO, but actually selected, one per
>> region, by the ALAC Selection Committee.
>> - 1 mentor selected from a slate of applicants, by the ALAC Selection
>> Committee
>>
>> The mentor starts mentoring all 5 mentees through a set of calls
>> throughout the year, with the 5 mentees. The mentor travels to each of the
>> ICANN meetings in the year.
>> With 3 ICANN meetings in a year, 2 mentees go to March meeting. 2 mentees
>> go to June meeting. 1 mentee goes to AGM in November. Thus, all 5 mentees
>> have had a chance to attend one funded ICANN meeting. This means there is
>> actually a shortfall of only 2 travel slots, one at the March meeting and
>> one at the June meeting. As the focus for mentoring is about policy, one
>> slot for each of these two meetings could be a discretionary slot current
>> available for a policy person to take part in the meeting.
>>
>> This is just a simple proposal - Feedback/Comments welcome as soon as
>> possible! We need to have finalised a process by the end of this week.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di
>> splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di
>> splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
> subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20171124/ed32494d/attachment.html>