[ALAC] Fwd: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review

[Seun Ojedeji]

The ccNSO decision seem to make sense to me. While the bylaw requires this,
I actually do think the EC can either keep silent and allow Board apply
some flexibility (somewhere in the bylaw should allow that or did we just
lock up the bylaws completely?) or send a collective letter to the Board to
hold on with this - though I know that will be a tall order as not all EC
members will prefer what is being suggested by ccNSO.

Cheers!

On May 2, 2017 23:10, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> FYI.
>
> From: Katrina Sataki <katrina at nic.lv>
>> To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve.crocker at board.icann.org>
>> Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 19:14:04 +0300
>> CC: <goran.marby at icann.org>, <ccnso-council at icann.org>, 'Chris Disspain'
>>         <chris at disspain.uk>, 'Mike Silber' <mike.silber at board.icann.org>,
>> "'SO/AC
>>  Chairs'" <soac-chairs at icann.org>
>> Subject: [soac-chairs] Participation of the ccNSO in the RDS-WHOIS2 review
>>
>>
>> Dear Steve:
>>
>> As, according to Section 4.6 (e) of the Bylaws, the Board caused the
>> Registration Directory Service (RDS-WHOIS2) review, I convey to you the
>> ccNSO Council decision with respect to participation of the ccNSO in this
>> review.
>>
>> As always, the ccNSO Council is available to explain its position.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Katrina Sataki
>> Chair of the ccNSO Council
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170503/9efbbd56/attachment.html>