[ALAC] ALS Communications Program - For Discussion

[Alberto Soto]

+1 Glenn, Olivier and Javier.

 

Regards

 

Alberto

 

De: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Javier Rua
Enviado el: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 4:41 PM
Para: Glenn McKnight <mcker and Javiernight.glenn at gmail.com>
CC: ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [ALAC] ALS Communications Program - For Discussion

 

We cannot set our own traps ourselves like this. We are sometimes the best allies of our worst adversaries.

Javier Rúa-Jovet

 

+1-787-396-6511

twitter: @javrua

skype: javier.rua1

https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua 

 


On Mar 14, 2017, at 4:39 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi Olivier 

 

No idea why this document wasn't  presented to our  WG's. We are working in silos

Since this is  dealing with communication, we clearly missed an opportunity 

I guess those led this  document are part of the 95% who agree with ITEMS  that  WG  are a waste of time and resources

 

G




Glenn McKnight
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> 
skype  gmcknight
twitter gmcknight
.

 

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com> > wrote:

Dear Alan,

I am sorry, but I do not understand why the At-Large working groups that deal with exactly this type of work are not included and kept more up to date about this work that was going on.

- At-Large Social Media Working Group
- ALAC Subcommittee on Outreach and Engagement

The RALOs were not involved or informed of progress either.

As a result, I have just lived a 1 hour groundhog day, that is, a repetition of all of the discussions that have taken place at RALO and RALO Secretariat and at working group level, with questions being asked in the document, that are already being addressed, and some already being responded to; with people making points that have already been made at RALO and RALO Secretariat and at working group level. 

On the one hand, we defend the need for the At-Large Community to have working groups and RALOs. On the other, we completely sideline them by having an ad-hoc ALS Communication Plan Task Force and a document that gets sent to the ALAC working list only (and no other lists).

We really need to look at what we do objectively and decide whether we want to practice what we preach or not. Otherwise, we risk being accused of schizophrenia or, worse still, hypocrisy.

Kindest regards,

Olivier 

On 14/03/2017 02:19, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Please find attached document for discussion on Tuesday. 

Alan




_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
 
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)





-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html


_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

 

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170315/da3e0bd5/attachment.html>