[ALAC] Fwd: Re: RDS Review

[Alan Greenberg]

To be clear, the issue was never staff support. 
The reduced scope came from the volunteer 
community because of the worry that the same 
people who were working on other RDS-related work 
(and particularly the GNSO PDP) would be the ones to best serve on this RT.

That is largely the same logic used by the 
CCWG-Accountability for suggesting that the scope of ATRT3 be reduced.

I'm not arguing for or against, just wanted to 
make sure we are all on the same page.

Alan

At 09/01/2017 12:28 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
>I agree with Tijani. The widened scope seems 
>justified although it will surely require more staff support.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>León
>
>Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
>El ene. 8, 2017, a las 11:02 PM, Tijani BEN 
>JEMAA 
><<mailto:tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com>tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com> escribió:
>
>>Alan,
>>
>>I understand the issue of bandwidth  but would 
>>accept the GNSO proposal because of the merit 
>>of the wide scope. In our comment we should 
>>note that we support the wide scope assuming 
>>that more time and more staff support would be provided to the review team.
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Tijani BEN JEMAA
>>Executive Director
>>Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
>>Phone: +216 98 330 114
>>            +216 52 385 114
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>>Le 9 janv. 2017 Ã  05:07, Alan Greenberg 
>>><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit :
>>>
>>>I am attaching a document from the GNSO on the 
>>>proposed RDS (formerly WHOIS) Review to be started very soon.
>>>
>>>You will recall that we previously had 
>>>approved a narrowing of the scope of the RDS 
>>>Review to focus just on the extent to which 
>>>the previous WHOIS Review Recommendations had 
>>>been implemented. This GNSO proposal widens 
>>>the scope considerably. Although there is no 
>>>question that the wider scope is interesting 
>>>and ptentially useful, it will also require 
>>>far more community involvement that the earlier proposal.
>>>
>>>The call for volunteers was to close on 13 
>>>January and a decision needs to be made 
>>>quickly on exactly what the Review should be.
>>>
>>>Comments please, with some urgency.
>>>
>>>Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "James M. Bladel" <<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>jbladel at godaddy.com>
>>>>Subject: Re: RDS Review
>>>>Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Karen and Community Leaders –
>>>>
>>>>The GNSO Council, working wiith its component 
>>>>Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, has 
>>>>produced this document (attached), which 
>>>>outlines our feedback and concerns with the 
>>>>proposed “limited scope” for the 
>>>>upcominoming RDS review.  The document was 
>>>>submitted to ICANN Staff, and sharing with this team for your reference.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you,
>>>>
>>>>J.
>>>>----------------
>>>>James Bladel
>>>>GNSO Chair
>>><GNSO Council feedback on 
>>>RDS.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>>ALAC mailing list
>>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>>><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ALAC mailing list
>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170109/d8f35222/attachment.html>