[ALAC] NomCom selection of ALAC Members
h.raiche at internode.on.net
Tue Dec 5 23:12:56 UTC 2017
The more insight into what we are looking for (or not) the better
On 6 Dec 2017, at 9:53 am, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org> wrote:
> Though the focus here is in recommendations to NomCom I believe we need to have relevant points also to send to RALOS in order to have adequate members working
> What I have seen during my 4 years inside NOMCOM was not always positive - some ALAC ( as well as other representatives too) were not the most adequate people for the position- Some premises are important:
> Knowledge of ICANN and the responsibilities and scope of each AC/ SO is relevant but other related to personality are also relevant : for instance:
> facility to work in group without trying to be the star ; research behavior to understand how to find not so clear information about a person; attention (dispersive persons are disruptive for the group) Facility to follow discussions in English (someone nearby has double task explaining each step); Listen person ;flexible personally to accept opposition without problem
> I also would like to suggest a kind of Process before the work to start to be organize by ALAC :
> Normally the person selected from each ralo does not know others from other ralos - A previous call among the 5 selected by each ralo and approved will help them to discuss relevant points from ALAC demand at the time, and can help them to better explain ALAC requisites to the entire NomCom group
> My first thoughts
> Vanda Scartezini
> Sent from my iPhone
> Sorry for typos
>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 11:41, Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>> Dear Alan,
>> - "... NomCom is seeking individuals of integrity, objectivity and
>> intelligence ..." perform intelligence tests?
>> - "the following knowledge, qualities and experiences are specifically
>> sought:". All this knowledge is required or is there some minimum basis?
>> - "Basic knowledge of the DNS." Basic knowledge is not enough, and the
>> clarification does not clarify ...
>> - The number of hours of dedication, is not considering the hours of
>> preparation of the meetings or the topics to be discussed in the WG.
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: ALAC [mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan
>> Enviado el: martes, 05 de diciembre de 2017 01:15 a.m.
>> Para: ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> Asunto: [ALAC] Fwd: NomCom selection of ALAC Members
>> I have received nothing so far in reply to this message. I will be reaching
>> out to a few people to help me adjust these documents, but all input is
>> welcome to try to ensure that applicants know what they are getting
>> themselves into.
>> The deadline is the start of next week.
>>> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:15:48 -0400
>>> To: ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>>> Subject: NomCom selection of ALAC Members
>>> The NomCom selects five ALAC members and over the years, some have done
>>> well and others not.
>>> The documentation used in the last year is attached. I am asking
>>> whether there is still time to revise it for the coming year. I suspect
>>> that if the answer is yes, time will be tight.
>>> I am interested in putting together a very small drafting team to
>>> consider such revisions.
>> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
More information about the ALAC