[ALAC] Consensus Call: ALAC Liaisons for 2017-18
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed Aug 16 02:51:08 UTC 2017
Following consultation with ALAC Members and with
our current Liaisons, this is Consensus Call on
how to address our Liaisons to the GNSO, ccNSO,
SSAC and GAC for the year beginning at the end of
ICANN60 to be held in Abu Dhabi.
Our current Liaisons are:
GNSO: Cheryl Langdon-Orr
GAC: Yrjö Länsipuro
ccNSO: Maureen Hilyard
SSAC: Julie Hammer
All four are serving the ALAC well. Cheryl and
Yrjö, both having served just one term (plus
several months for Yrjö) and have agreed, with
the support of the ALAC, to continue in their
roles. Maureen and Julie have both indicated that
they wish to step down from their Liaison roles.
In the case of the ccNSO, we expect the
identification and training of a replacement to
take a significant number of months, during which
time Maureen will stay on as Liaison. In the case
of the SSAC, as Julie will become the new
Vice-Chair of the SSAC in January, she would like
to step down as soon as practical, but has agreed
to serve for the first months of the ICANN year
if a replacement has not been named by then.
In all four cases and in accordance with ALAC RoP
18.2 (See
<http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-RoP-2016-09>http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-RoP-2016-09
and reproduced at the end of this message), I am
proposing that the ALAC re-appoint the current Liaisons.
In parallel with this we will also begin the
process of identifying a replacement for both Maureen and Julie.
ccNSO:
A set of qualifications will be assembled and a
call will be issued for volunteers interested in
serving as the ALAC Liaison to the ccNSO.
Depending on the number of candidates, either
Maureen will work with the candidates (with the
permission of the ccNSO) and ultimately makes a
recommendation or set of recommendations on the
future ccNSO Liaison. If there are too many
candidates, the ALAC Appointee Selection
Committee (AASC) working with Maureen will select
a sub-set for Maureen to mentor. This process
will continue into the coming year, but the
success we had with a similar process last time
there was a change in ccNSO Liaison indicates
that it is worth the time and effort.
SSAC:
A set of qualifications will be assembled and a
call will be issued for volunteers. The list of
candidates will go to the AASC who, with Julie's
assistance, will select no more than two
potential candidates. Those selected will be
forwarded to the SSAC (ratified by the ALAC). If
the SSAC decides to admit one person to the SSAC,
that person is our SSAC Liaison. If the SSAC
selects more than one, this subset of people
returns the AASC for final selection. Due to the
number of steps and the requirement for the SSAC
Membership Committee and the SSAC to meet, this
may or may not happen prior to the end of ICANN60.
With this message, I am initiating a Consensus
Call of the ALAC to ratify the above recommendations.
This Consensus Call will end at 23:59 UTC on Monday, 21 August 2017.
If there are any questions of comments, please
direct them to either this list or to me directly.
Although messages indicating support are welcome,
they are not necessary. This Consensus Call will
be deemed to have succeeded in the absence of
significant opposition (greater than 20% as specified by ALAC RoP 12.3.3.1).
Alan
=======================
ALAC Rules of Procedure
18.1 Appointments of At-Large Appointees to
various bodies both inside and outside of ICANN
will be made by the ALAC. Such appointments will
normally be initiated by a call for volunteers,
posted by the Chair/Staff to the Approved
Distribution Lists, and on other lists if
appropriate, allowing at least seven days for
people to volunteer. The decision regarding
appointments is typically made via Consensus.
However, the Chair will initiate a secret ballot
to determine which candidate is to be appointed
if Consensus cannot be reached or if this is requested by any ALAC Member.
18.2 By the decision of the ALAC, a current
Appointee who is willing to continue in that role
may be reconfirmed instead of initiating a new selection process.
18.3 In the case of selections requiring complex
criteria evaluation, the ALAC may choose to form
a sub-committee to carry out the analysis and to
make recommendations to the ALAC based on that analysis.
18.4 For situations where the ALAC is not
empowered to make appointments but rather to
endorse one or more candidates, essentially the
same process as described here for appointments
should be used, but with the outcome being an endorsement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170815/6689215a/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list