[ALAC] Fwd: Approved Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed May 18 13:52:38 UTC 2016
The full set of resolutions from the Board meeting a few days ago.
Of particular merit to At-Large and ALAC:
- Former ALAC Member John Levine appointed to the SSAC
- Public Comment on proposed Conduct at ICANN
Meetings revision, addressing harrassment.
- Creation of a Board Working Group on Internet Governance (including Rinalia)
- Approval of AC/SO budgets as submitted by staff.
Alan
>From: David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>
>To: "soac-infoalert at icann.org" <soac-infoalert at icann.org>
>Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:46:23 +0000
>Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Approved Board
>Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board
>
>
><https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en>https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en
>
>From:
><https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en>https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en
>
>
>Approved Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board
>
>15 May 2016
>
>1.Consent Agenda:
>
> a. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.01), the Board approves the
>minutes of the 3, 9 and 10 March 2016 Meetings of the ICANN Board.
>
>
> b. Security & Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Appointment
>
>Whereas, the Security and Stability Advisory
>Committee (SSAC) reviews its membership and
>makes adjustments from time-to-time.
>
>Whereas, the SSAC Membership Committee, on
>behalf of the SSAC, requested that the Board
>should appoint John R. Levine to the SSAC for a
>three-year term beginning immediately upon
>approval by the Board and
><x-apple-data-detectors://3>ending on 31 December 2019.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.02), the Board appoints
>John R. Levine to the SSAC for a three-year term
>beginning immediately and
><x-apple-data-detectors://4>ending on 31 December 2019.
>
>
>
> c. GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Charter Amendments (2016)
>
>Whereas, the ICANN Bylaws (Article X, Section
>5.3) state, "Each [GNSO] Stakeholder Group shall
>maintain recognition with the ICANN Board."
>
>Whereas, the Board has established a Process For
>Amending GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Charters (the "Process").
>
>Whereas, the GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder
>Group (RySG), ICANN staff, and the
>Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC)
>have completed all steps identified in the Process.
>
>Whereas, the amendments appear to address a
>number of matters the Board directed to the
>RySG's attention in previous Board Resolution Number 2015.10.22.14.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.03), the ICANN Board
>approves the RySG Charter Amendments as
>documented in the briefing materials submitted
>to the Board The RySG and ICANN staff are
>directed to provide access to the new governing
>document on the appropriate web pages for the
>RySG. The Board directs the RySG to review the
>changes within one year to determine if they are
>having the intended impacts. ICANN staff is
>further directed to share this resolution with the leadership of the RySG.
>
>
>
> d. Conduct at ICANN Meetings
>
>Whereas, during and after ICANN55, the issue of
>certain community-member conduct toward one
>another has been raised in various sessions and lists.
>
>Whereas, the Board Governance Committee (BGC)
>has reviewed proposed revisions to the language
>of the Expected Standards of Behavior that align
>with generally accepted broad standards for
>areas of protection, and recommended that the
>Board authorize the revised version be posted for public comment.
>
>Whereas, the BGC also has recommended that the
>Board direct the President and CEO, or his
>designee(s), to retain an expert, as
>appropriate, with experience in drafting and
>implementing relevant anti-harassment policies
>to assist in the development of a Community
>anti-harassment policy/procedure to be followed at ICANN Public Meetings.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.04), the Board hereby
>authorizes the posting for public comment of the
>proposed revised Expected Standards of Behavior.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.05), the Board hereby
>directs the President and CEO, or his
>designee(s), to retain an expert, as
>appropriate, with experience in drafting and
>implementing relevant anti-harassment policies
>to assist in the development of a Community
>anti-harassment policy/procedure to be followed
>at ICANN Public Meetings, which could include
>items such as complaints handling and resolution and enforcement processes.
>
>
> e. Board Working Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG)
>
>Whereas, the Internet governance landscape
>continues to evolve, and ICANN's role within the
>Internet governance ecosystem will also continue
>to evolve and will benefit from an enhanced
>dialogue between the Board and management
>working on Internet governance issues.
>
>Whereas, the Board Governance Committee (BGC)
>has recommended that the Board form a Board
>Working Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG) to
>provide consultation and advice on ICANN's
>efforts related to involvement in Internet
>governance work, as appropriate within ICANN's
>mission and in service of ICANN's strategic
>plan, which includes providing consultation with
>ICANN staff on collaboration and engagement in Internet governance activities.
>
>Whereas, the BGC has recommended that the Board
>appoint the following Board members to the
>BWG-IG: Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Ron da Silva, Chris
>Disspain, Markus Kummer (Chair), Erika Mann,
>George Sadowsky and Lousewies van der Laan.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.06), the Board hereby
>approves the establishment of a Board Working
>Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG) in
>accordance with the Charter recommended by the
>BGC with the following membership: Rinalia Abdul
>Rahim, Ron da Silva, Chris Disspain, Markus
>Kummer (Chair), Erika Mann, George Sadowsky and Lousewies van der Laan.
>
>
>
>2. Main Agenda:
>
> a. Consideration of GNSO Policy
> Recommendations concerning the Accreditation of Privacy and Proxy Services
>
>Whereas, on 31 October 2013, the GNSO Council
>approved the charter for a Working Group to
>conduct a Policy Development Process that had
>been requested by the ICANN Board concerning the
>accreditation by ICANN of privacy and proxy
>domain name registration service providers, as
>further described at
><http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/raa-pp-charter-22oct13-en.pdf>http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/raa-pp-charter-22oct13-en.pdf
>[PDF, 463 KB].
>
>Whereas, the PDP followed the prescribed PDP
>steps as stated in the ICANN Bylaws, resulting
>in a Final Report being delivered to the GNSO Council on 8 December 2015.
>
>Whereas, the Privacy & Proxy Services
>Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group (WG)
>reached Full Consensus on all its final
>recommendations (see
><http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf>http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf)
>[PDF, 1.2 MB].
>
>Whereas, the GNSO Council reviewed and discussed
>the final recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy
>Services Accreditation Issues PDP WG, and
>adopted the recommendations on 21 January 2016
>by a unanimous vote (see:
><http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201601>http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201601).
>
>Whereas, the GNSO Council vote met and exceeded
>the required voting threshold (i.e.
>supermajority) to impose new obligations on ICANN contracted parties.
>
>Whereas, in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws, a
>public comment period was opened on the approved
>recommendations to provide the community with a
>reasonable opportunity to comment on their
>adoption prior to action by the ICANN Board, and
>the comments received have been summarized and
>reported (see
><https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-ppsai-recommendations-31mar16-en.pdf>https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-ppsai-recommendations-31mar16-en.pdf)
>[PDF, 299 KB].
>
>Whereas, the ICANN Bylaws provide that the Board
>is to request the GAC's opinion regarding "any
>policies that are being considered by the Board
>for adoption that substantially affect the
>operation of the Internet or third parties,
>including the imposition of any fees or charges"
>and "take duly into account any advice timely presented" as a result.
>
>Whereas, the Board notified the GAC of the
>publication of the GNSO's final recommendations
>for public comment on 19 February 2016 (see
><https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27492514/2016-02-19-Steve-Crocker-to-Thomas-Schneider-GNSO-PDP.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1456046942000&api=v2>https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27492514/2016-02-19-Steve-Crocker-to-Thomas-Schneider-GNSO-PDP.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1456046942000&api=v2)
>[PDF, 819 KB].
>
>Whereas, in its Marrakech Communique issued on 9
>March 2016 the GAC advised the ICANN Board that
>it needed more time to consider potential public
>policy concerns relating to the adoption of the
>final PDP recommendations, and identifying that
>the June 2016 ICANN56 meeting would be an
>appropriate opportunity to further consider
>these items (see
><https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/GAC%20Morocco%2055%20Communique%20FINAL.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1458046221000&api=v2>https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/GAC%20Morocco%2055%20Communique%20FINAL.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1458046221000&api=v2)
>[PDF, 567 KB].
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.07), the Board thanks the
>GNSO for completing the Board-requested Policy
>Development Process (PDP) and acknowledges
>receipt of the PDP Final Report and the GNSO
>Council's Recommendations Report concerning the final PDP recommendations.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.08), the Board identifies
>that more time is required to consider the final
>PDP recommendations, including time for the
>provision and consideration of GAC advice, if
>any will be provided. The Board anticipates
>taking further action on the recommendations at
>the first Board meeting following the ICANN56
>Public Meeting in Helsinki, Finland.
>
>
>
> b. Report re: .HOTEL
>
>No resolution taken.
>
>
> C. SO/AC FY17 Additional Budget Requests Approval
>
>Whereas, prior discussions between community
>members and ICANN staff members identified the
>need for an earlier decision on the funding of
>additional budget requests from ICANN's
>Supporting Organizations (SO) and Advisory Committees (AC).
>
>Whereas, the staff created an SO/AC additional
>budget requests process, to collect, review and
>submit for Board approval funding requests from the SOs and ACs.
>
>Whereas, requests were submitted by the ICANN
>community by the set deadline, and were reviewed
>by a panel of staff members representing the
>Policy, Stakeholder Engagement and Finance departments.
>
>Whereas, the review panel recommended the
>approval of requests representing $643,700 for approval.
>
>Whereas the Board Finance Committee, reviewed
>the process followed and the staff proposal, and
>has recommended that the Board approve the staff recommendation.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.09), the Board approves
>committing $643,700 during Fiscal Year 2017 to
>cover the costs associated with the adopted SO/AC additional budget requests.
>
>
>d. October 2016 ICANN Meeting Venue Contracting
>
>Whereas, ICANN intended to hold its third Public
>Meeting of 2016 in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in the North America region.
>
>Whereas, the Zika Virus outbreak in Puerto Rico
>has caused the need for a relocation of the Public Meeting.
>
>Whereas, ICANN must identify an alternative venue.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.10), the Board authorizes
>the President and CEO, or his designee(s), to
>engage in and facilitate all necessary
>contracting and disbursements for ICANN 57 in an
>amount [REDACTED FOR NEGOTIATION PURPOSES].
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.11), specific items within
>this resolution shall remain confidential for
>negotiation purposes pursuant to Article III,
>section 5.2 of the ICANN Bylaws until the
>President and CEO determines that the confidential information may be released.
>
>
>
>
> e. USG IANA Stewardship Transition - Additional FY16 Expenses and Funding
>
>Whereas, the Board has approved expense budget
>envelopes to support the IANA Stewardship
>Transition Project ("Project") during FY15 and
>FY16, and all approved budget envelopes will
>have been used after the ICANN Meeting 55 in Marrakech.
>
>Whereas, a Project Cost Support Team was
>implemented to produce Project expense estimates
>for the remainder of FY16 and for FY17 for the Project.
>
>Whereas, Project Cost Support Team produced
>expense estimates for the Project expenses of up
>to approximately US$5.4 million to be incurred through the remainder of FY16.
>
>Whereas, the Board Finance Committee met on 3
>March 2016 and has approved to recommend to the
>Board to approve an additional Project expense
>budget envelope of up US$5.4 million to cover
>Project expenses through the remainder of FY16.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.12), the Board approves a
>budget envelope of up to US$5.4 million to cover
>the costs of the Project to be incurred through
>the remainder of FY16 to be funded through a
>fund release from the Reserve Fund.
>
>
>f. AOB
>
>i. Enhancing Openness and Transparency - Board Deliberations
>
>Whereas, the Board believes that providing
>increased access to Board deliberations is
>important, and that increased openness is an
>important means of working toward that goal.
>
>Whereas, the ICANN Board discussed at its
>Amsterdam workshop how to improve its
>functioning and agreed that enhancing the
>visibility into the Board deliberations and
>decision-making processes was an important part
>of becoming more accountable and more transparent.
>
>Whereas, the Board noted the call from the
>community for increased openness and transparency.
>
>Whereas, the Board believes that a positive
>first step towards increased openness is
>publicly posting transcripts and/or recordings
>of its deliberative sessions to the extent that
>such information or dialogue is not subject to
>confidentiality restrictions or privilege.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.13), the Board directs the
>President and CEO, or his designee(s), to work
>with the Board to develop a proposed plan for
>the publication of transcripts and/or recordings
>of Board deliberative sessions, with such plan
>to include an assessment of possible resources
>costs and fiscal impact, and draft processes to:
>(i) ensure the accuracy of the transcript; and
>(ii) for redaction of portions of the transcript
>that should be maintained as confidential or privileged.
>
>Resolved (2016.05.15.14), the Board expects to
>evaluate the plan in Helsinki, and if
>satisfactory to begin testing of the proposed
>processes relating to publication of transcripts
>and/or recordings of the Board's deliberative
>sessions as soon as practicable after Helsinki.
>
>
>
>
>
>3. Executive Session - CONFIDENTIAL
>
>The Board held a confidential portion of the
>session relating to employment matters.
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>David A. Olive
>Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support
>General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters Istanbul
>Hakki Yeten Cad. Sellenium Plaza No:10/C
>K:<tel:10%2034349>10 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>Direct Line: <tel:+90.212.999.6212>+90.212.999.6212
>Mobile: <tel:+%201.%20202.341.3611>+ 1. 202.341.3611
>Mobile: <tel:+90.533.341.6550>+90.533.341.6550
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>
>1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:DmUUEZaEsVINzqlRX2uwEAmu20MGxQYFjxxanLDonzSXZFXjj2r8XkpRsrxebPYafO/iEqJjC8aL+6wJ65pkt2DgoWeaLbCeL+d9b08kMzL2I/jqosy0J+Z6zhtLyomV0gg9/HxOHwKEH3K8yhba4ArADpr+vOtbrBLY2OCSSxy7+6qRIHQjrcEA7bPwBAm/
>
>_______________________________________________
>soac-infoalert mailing list
>soac-infoalert at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160518/85473023/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list