[ALAC] Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace

Yrjö Länsipuro yrjo_lansipuro at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 13 15:40:32 UTC 2016


Hi all,


At the GAC-SSAC meeting in Helsinki (Thursday, 30 June), after Patrik explained why SSAC was going to issue 083, there was some discussion on whether the dotless domain issue should be mentioned in the GAC Helsinki communiqué. However it was pointed out that GAC already took up the matter in its Durban (2013) communiqué ("The GAC Advises the ICANN Board to: a. As a matter of urgency consider the recommendations contained in the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains (SAC053) and Internal Name Certificates (SAC057)").  Most countries that took the floor felt it was not necessary to repeat the advice in Helsinki communiqué.


Best,


Yrjö

________________________________
From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:39 PM
To: Alan Greenberg; Julie Hammer
Cc: ALAC ExCom; ALAC Working List
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace


Thanks Julie. Understood GAC was quite concerned also and SSAC report guess put a final point in this matter.





Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004

01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253

Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464

Sorry for any typos.





From: <alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 11:07 AM
To: Julie Hammer <julie.hammer at bigpond.com>
Cc: ALAC ExCom <alac-excom at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, 'ALAC List' <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace



Excellent. Thanks Julie.  Alan

At 11/07/2016 05:00 PM, Julie Hammer wrote:




Hi Alan,

Tha SSAC Comment (SAC083 < https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents>) on the proposed amendments, specifically on the issue of dotless domains, has now been published.  I have attached it for your info but not sure if the attachment will go through to the list.

Cheers,  Julie




On 11 Jul 2016, at 5:59 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

For those of you who do not "follow" all of our Wiki pages, please note the comment I made today on the Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement.

When I and others first reviewed the amendments, we did not find much to comment on. In conversations during and after Helsinki (with both At-Large people and those from other parts of ICANN), it became more obvious (to me) that there are several issues that need to be raised - forcefully.

The comment period officially ends this coming Wednesday, but I have asked for a week's extension. We should hear tomorrow whether this is granted.

The registry agreement governs the core of one of ICANN's main areas of responsibility. Please look at the comments at https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw and circulate as appropriate.

If there is no extension granted, we will have to act very quickly, so please let us know if you, in general or in detail, support the ALAC making such a comment.

Alan (taking time out from a great and peaceful vacation in Finland, so you have some idea of the importance I put on this)

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )


Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
         boundary="Apple-Mail=_B1E6F731-8118-4AB5-AFE4-C6D09C84FD9B"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==

Hi Alan,

Tha SSAC Comment (SAC083<https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents>) on the proposed amendments, specifically on the issue of dotless domains, has now been published.  I have attached it for your info but not sure if the attachment will go through to the list.

Cheers,  Julie

Content-Disposition: inline; filename="sac-083-en.pdf"
Content-Type: application/pdf; x-unix-mode=0644; name="sac-083-en.pdf"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==


Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==



On 11 Jul 2016, at 5:59 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> > wrote:

For those of you who do not "follow" all of our Wiki pages, please note the comment I made today on the Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement.

When I and others first reviewed the amendments, we did not find much to comment on. In conversations during and after Helsinki (with both At-Large people and those from other parts of ICANN), it became more obvious (to me) that there are several issues that need to be raised - forcefully.

The comment period officially ends this coming Wednesday, but I have asked for a week's extension. We should hear tomorrow whether this is granted.

The registry agreement governs the core of one of ICANN's main areas of responsibility. Please look at the comments at https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw and circulate as appropriate.

If there is no extension granted, we will have to act very quickly, so please let us know if you, in general or in detail, support the ALAC making such a comment.

Alan (taking time out from a great and peaceful vacation in Finland, so you have some idea of the importance I put on this)

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160713/2265a313/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list