[ALAC] Discussions on ALAC Positions on CCWG Recommendations
Wafa Dahmani
wafa at ati.tn
Wed Feb 3 20:31:13 UTC 2016
I support
envoyer par huawei telephone
Le 3 févr. 2016 20:57, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit :
>
> One of the problems we have had is that when commenting on previous
> CCWG reports, there have been two parallel discussions, one on the
> ALAC list, and one on the IANA-Issues WG list.
>
> Currently about 1/2 of the ALAC and 9 regional leaders are not on the
> IANA-Issues list.
>
> The traffic on that list is low. In January, there were 42 messages,
> and 32 of those were related to meeting schedules, with only 10 on substance.
>
> Adding someone to the list makes it easier for them to attend a WG
> meeting, but does not imply any obligation to do so.
>
> Is there any objection if we add those people to the IANA-Issues list
> now? This would allow the important discussion on whether to ratify
> or not on a single list.
>
> We could remove those who wanted to leave once the final decision is
> taken in or before Marrakech.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
More information about the ALAC
mailing list