[ALAC] Discussions on ALAC Positions on CCWG Recommendations

Wafa Dahmani wafa at ati.tn
Wed Feb 3 20:31:13 UTC 2016


I support

envoyer par huawei telephone

Le 3 févr. 2016 20:57, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit :
>
> One of the problems we have had is that when commenting on previous 
> CCWG reports, there have been two parallel discussions, one on the 
> ALAC list, and one on the IANA-Issues WG list. 
>
> Currently about 1/2 of the ALAC and 9 regional leaders are not on the 
> IANA-Issues list. 
>
> The traffic on that list is low. In January, there were 42 messages, 
> and 32 of those were related to meeting schedules, with only 10 on substance. 
>
> Adding someone to the list makes it easier for them to attend a WG 
> meeting, but does not imply any obligation to do so. 
>
> Is there any objection if we add those people to the IANA-Issues list 
> now? This would allow the important discussion on whether to ratify 
> or not on a single list. 
>
> We could remove those who wanted to leave once the final decision is 
> taken in or before Marrakech. 
>
> Alan 
>
> _______________________________________________ 
> ALAC mailing list 
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac 
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org 
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) 


More information about the ALAC mailing list