[ALAC] Process to ratify CCWG Proposal
Timothy Denton
tim at tmdenton.com
Wed Feb 3 19:50:42 UTC 2016
Seems reasonable.
TMD
On 2/2/2016 10:13 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> On the assumption the the CCWG will come to closure on all issues and
> publish a revised final proposal, that ALAC needs a process by which
> we can decide whether to ratify it or not.
>
> We are starting to see "final" revised documents for the various
> recommendations.
>
> I propose the following:
>
> 1. As these documents are made available, I suggest that we distribute
> them to the ALAC and IANA-Issues lists, along with a (hopefully)
> concise summary of what has changed. I can do some of these summaries,
> but I am looking for volunteers who have a good understanding of other
> recommendations to volunteer to do those (please volunteer directly to
> me).
>
> 2. All comments will be welcome, but for each document, if there are
> any concerns THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT JUSTIFY ALAC REJECTION, these must be
> raised promptly for discussion. If there are statements that you feel
> the ALAC MUST make in relation to a recommendation, even though we
> will ratify, these should also be raised.
>
> 3. By the time we get to Marrakech, we should have already covered the
> majority of the proposal.
>
> 4. In Marrakech, we will allow sufficient time for the discussion of
> any final changes and if appropriate a formal vote on either the
> entire proposal, or on a recommendation-by recommendation basis.
>
> Comments please.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
--
Timothy Denton 613-789-5397 line 613 222 1850 cell
More information about the ALAC
mailing list