[ALAC] ACTION: Endorsements: Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team

[Seun Ojedeji]

Okay if there is a time factor, then I suggest that ALAC get to work in the
endorsement process and no need for the subgroup.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 17 Nov 2015 06:11, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Regarding decision, if the ALAC delegates, it is effectively making the
> decision. We'll see what others think.
>
> From my perspective, since this kind of recommendation is not likely to be
> over-ridden by the ALAC, having the ALAC make the final decision just takes
> time from the selection process.
>
> Alan
>
> At 16/11/2015 11:52 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> Hello Alan,
>
> I am in support of the group preparing the summary of each person and
> making their recommendation.
>
> I think actual selection should be the role of ALAC.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 17 Nov 2015 03:13, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca > wrote:
> In Dublin I suggested that the ALT recommend who to endorse for the
> Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review Team and there was a
> strong feeling within the ALAC that this responsibility not be given to the
> ALT. The applicants have now been announced and we need to decide who to
> endorse - https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/aoc/cct/applications.
>
> I suggest that we use the same composition for the selection team as we
> have for a number of other recent groups, for each region, one ALAC Member
> selected by the Members from that region, and one person selected by the
> RALO leadership. No one who has submitted an application is eligible to
> serve of the endorsement group. All team members will need to:
>
> - Be familiar with the purpose of the Review (
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/call-volunteers-cct-rt-2015-10-01-en
> ).
> - Review the Applications.
> - Prepare a brief evaluation of each candidate (details to be provided).
>
> Endorsements are due no later than 14 December.
>
> Nine people indicated that they were seeking ALAC endorsements, five
> seeking only an ALAC endorsement, and four list multiple alternatives.
>
> I am happy to have the ALAC delegate the endorsements to this group, and
> if the ALAC agrees, there will be no need for the ALAC to ratify the
> endorsements.
>
> We will be scheduling the first (and possibly only) meeting of the group
> for the week on November 30th, so please submit names within the next week
> to ensure that we can select a suitable time for the meeting.
>
> To be clear, I am looking for:
>
> 1. Any objections to having the group make the endorsements without
> further ALAC action.
>
> 2. The name of the ALAC member from each region to participate in the
> endorsement process.
>
> 3. The name of the regional appointee from each region to participate in
> the endorsement process.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20151117/c654189e/attachment.html>