[ALAC] Questions on Accountability Proposals

[Alan Greenberg]

Murray, You cannot fully support the comments of Maureen and Olivier 
because they answered exactly oppositely to Q3.

Alan

At 31/05/2015 12:15 PM, Murray McKercher wrote:
>1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes
>
>I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen.
>
>Consensus consultation and transparency provide the foundation for 
>democratic process. If ICANN is serious in its dedication to 
>creating a democratic global governance system, then commitment to 
>consensus consultation and transparency is key. Substantive movement 
>towards confrontational legalistic processes may undermine the 
>strategic goals of the organisation and the spirit to which the 
>volunteers are committed.
>
>Murray McKercher
>
>
>
>On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 PM, Alan Greenberg 
><alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
>
>Yes, No and No.
>
>At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> >1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
> >ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?
> >
> >2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal
> >enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
> >removal if you supported that).
> >
> >3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal enforceability,
> >is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?
> >
> >Alan
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150531/959e4e48/attachment.html>