[ALAC] CWG IANA Transition Proposal Comment

[Sébastien Bachollet]

Hello,
Thanks Alan for this draft.
As I am in a place where the Internet cnx is very poor, I can¹t really use
Wiki for those comment.
I will try to give you my comments here.
- TO ADD - 
(to remove)

Lines 28/30 Š the ALAC would - STRONGLY - preferŠ to accept (the) - A -
compromiseŠ
Line 106 Š this - TYPE OF - compromise.

Lines 143/146 I don¹t think we want to push to a possible separation from
ICANN. It is where we risk to loose the multistakeholder model all in one.
If we have to go to this construct, I would like to suggest that the PTI
Board be either:
- the full ICANN Board
- a subset of the ICANN Board (if the IANA Board committee would have been
still in function it would have been a good candidate).

Thanks
All the best

Sébastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>




Le 19/05/2015 07:08, « Alan Greenberg » <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit
:

>The first draft of the proposed comment on the CWG report has been posted.
>
>The full set of community comments and the draft can be found at
>https://community.icann.org/x/XConAw. The PDF version of the draft
>comment is also attached to this e-mail.
>
>The deadline for submission is tomorrow, Wednesday, 20 May, and the
>ALAC will be ratifying the submission after-the-fact.
>
>If you have not yet looked at the draft comment, please do, as there
>is little time left to provide feedback.
>
>Alan_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki:
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(A
>LAC)