[ALAC] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] decision making by the community - tool to play with

[Julie Hammer]

Hi Leon,

The problem is not anything you are doing.  Some of the mailing lists are set up so that they do not permit attachments through.  They strip off any attached documents.  I have the same problem when trying to distribute SSAC Reports.  Olivier tried to get this fixed but looks like the problem persists.  Perhaps staff might need to have another chat with the IT folks?

Cheers,  Julie

On 19 Mar 2015, at 11:31 pm, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> wrote:

HI Dev, 

Sorry for that. Attached.


Best regards,


León

> El 19/03/2015, a las 7:10, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin at ttcsweb.org> escribió:
> 
> Hi Leon, there was no attached spreadsheet
> 
> Dev Anand
> 
> On 18 March 2015 at 23:13, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I believe this information might be of the interest to all of us.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> León
> 
>> Inicio del mensaje reenviado:
>> 
>> De: Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net <mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>
>> Fecha: 18 de marzo de 2015 15:22:10 GMT-6
>> Para: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>> Asunto: [CCWG-ACCT] decision making by the community - tool to play with
>> 
>> All,
>> the composition of the community council (or whatever we might ultimately call it) is still unclear. Open issues - amongst others - are:
>> 
>> - voting vs consensus calls
>> - mandated voting vs non-mandated voting
>> - number of representatives from SOs/ACs
>> - voting thresholds
>> - weighting of votes
>> …
>> 
>> As indicated during the call yesterday, we have been working with Berry on a spreadsheet, which you find attached to this e-mail and which allows you to test different scenarios. You can enter the number of representatives per group and their voting behavior and then see how that impacts the outcome of decisions for different voting thresholds.
>> 
>> We do know that this is not the silver bullet solution, but it helps to better understand the impact of different approaches.
>> 
>> We hope you find this helpful and encourage you to come up with concrete suggestions for the composition of the "community council“.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Thomas
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)