[ALAC] CWG-Stewardship Proposal Motion

[Alan Greenberg]

My position on 2c and 2d is that we should not include them.

In both cases, I believe that they would actually harm or reduce the 
effectiveness of the processes in question.

For 2c, I believe that since the CSC has either triggered a special 
IFRT or is a major source of input into a regular IFRT, the RT is 
well served by having direct input from the CSC. The alternative is 
that information from the CSC is either filtered through some other 
member, is provided solely in written form, or a CSC member is 
requested to be present to relay the information directly. The first 
two are poor replacements for direct dialogue and the latter is 
effectively a Liaison.

For 2d, any group contributing a member of the SCWG may feel that 
their IFRT member is the person best suited for the SCWG. In the case 
of a group with limited resources such as the ALAC, a second person 
with suitable knowledge may not even be available.

Alan


At 25/06/2015 12:49 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>Please find attached the proposed motion in WORD and PDF formats.
>
>Note that Resolved items 2c and 2d are "bracketed" and the ALAC will 
>need to decide on whether to include them or not prior to voting on 
>the motion itself.
>
>Alan
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)