[ALAC] URGENT: ALAC Review of Sensitive TLDs and necessary PICs

[Alan Greenberg]

Thank you Alberto.

The important question here is for WHICH TLDs do 
we need the extra checks. .bank, for instance, 
has agreed to do those checks. We all know and 
accept that .com, .org and most ccTLDs do NOT do verifications.

Alan

At 16/06/2015 09:05 AM, Alberto Soto wrote:
>I disagree with lowering the requirements of clauses 6 and 7. There is
>identity theft and credit problems if the check can not be left until after
>the fact and then making the complaint. It is a disservice to the individual
>user.
>
>Kind regards
>
>Alberto Soto
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan Greenberg
>Enviado el: martes, 16 de junio de 2015 02:18 a.m.
>Para: ALAC
>Asunto: [ALAC] URGENT: ALAC Review of Sensitive TLDs and necessary PICs
>Importancia: Alta
>
>As you will all remember, in LA, we issued advice to the Board regarding the
>highly regulated and sensitive TLD for which the GAC had requested specific
>safeguards.
>
>To date, that advice has neither been accepted or rejected and is still the
>subject of discussion.
>
>I have summarized the overall story and have provided the assessment that I,
>Evan and Olivier have made of the TLD in question.
>
>The board interaction with the ALAC on this issue has been revolutionary
>(and will also be raised in the ALAC Board meeting in BA).
>
>In Buenos Aires, this issue will be on the agenda and there will be a
>discussion with the GAC which will include this topic.
>
>Please review this document and the assessments that have been made, and be
>prepared to indicate whether you agree with the assessments, or to further
>discuss them.
>
>Alan
>
>
>---
>El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este 
>correo electrónico en busca de virus.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus