[ALAC] CONSENSUS CALL Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submissionon ICANN's Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

h.raiche at internode.on.net h.raiche at internode.on.net
Thu Sep 25 17:20:03 UTC 2014


 
Happy to add my name to the consensus  
 
Holly 
On Thu 25/09/14 10:51 PM , Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com sent: 
> Repeated with the Subject - CONSENSUS CALL so as to make it stand out. 
>  
> -------- Forwarded Message -------- 
> Subject: Re: [ALAC] Fwd: RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's 
> Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan 
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:08:39 +0200 
> From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond  
> To: alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
> CC: staff >> ICANN AtLarge Staff  
>  
> Dear ALAC members, 
>  
> I am following up on my message below which included the Registry 
> Stakeholder Group's Statement on the topic of the "enhancing ICANN 
> Accountability" plan. 
>  
> The ALT discussed the matter yesterday and was reminded that 
> according 
> to our ALAC Rules of Procedure, the ALAC Chair would be able to make 
> a 
> decision and respond to a process without an ALAC vote, asking for 
> the 
> ratification vote to take place afterwards. 
> Historically, on occasions, we have sometimes also sent Statements to 
> public comment periods prior to official ratification by the ALAC 
> provided we knew there was consensus on the Statement. 
>  
> With the Registry's Statement being considered, it was the feeling of 
> the ALT that the ALAC should have no objection in supporting such a 
> Statement, for the following reasons: 
>  
> 1. The Statement contains no points which are contrary to an ALAC 
> position. 
> 2. With the amount of time remaining (closing date Saturday 27 
> September 
> 2014) the Statement is more complete that any Statement the ALAC 
> could 
> draft in such a short amount of time. 
> 3. A Joint Statement from SOs, AC and SGs is likely to have much more 
> impact than separate Statements from various communities. This has 
> been 
> shown already in the speed of the response to the prior joint 
> Statement 
> which the ALAC has signed on. 
> 4. at a time when all lights are on ICANN, showing alignment of the 
> Community means we can work better and across silos - a good showcase 
> of 
> the multi-stakeholder model. 
>  
> I would therefore ask you all for a 24H consensus call now starting 
> at 
> 13:00 UTC and ending on Friday 26 September 2014 at 13:00 UTC. Should 
> I 
> receive no formal objection to the ALAC supporting this Statement, I 
> shall proceed forward with offering the ALAC's support for the 
> Statement. Shortly after Friday, Staff will launch a standard 
> ratification vote for the support of the Statement. 
>  
> If there are objections to the Statement being supported by the ALAC, 
> I 
> plan to offer my individual support to it. For your comfort, please 
> find 
> a copy of the proposed Statement attached again to this message. 
>  
> Kindest regards, 
>  
> Olivier MJ Crpin-Leblond 
> ALAC Chair 
>  
> On 24/09/2014 18:02, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: 
> > Dear ALAC members, 
> > 
> > please be so kind to find the suggested joint Statement from the 
> > Registry Stakeholder Group. (attached as a docx and PDF) 
> > Feedback needed as soon as possible. The ALT will be discussing 
> this in 
> > a few hours. 
> > Kindest regards, 
> > 
> > Olivier 
> > 
> > 
> > -------- Forwarded Message -------- 
> > Subject: RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN 
> > Accountabitliy Plan 
> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:48:10 +0000 
> > From: Drazek, Keith  
> > To: SO/AC/SG/C Chairs 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all, 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Following up my earlier email, I’ve attached the latest draft of 
> the 
> > RySG comments on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process. 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Feel free to share these with your respective groups if you find 
> them 
> > helpful. 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Please respond to this message with any updates from your 
> respective 
> > groups. Are you planning to submit comments? Are you open to 
> developing 
> > a joint SO-AC-SG-C leaders’ statement? 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > 
> > Keith 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > ALAC mailing list 
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac [1] 
> > 
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org [2] 
> > ALAC Working Wiki: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL 
> AC[3]) 
>  
> --  
> Olivier MJ Crpin-Leblond, PhD 
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html [4] 
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> ALAC mailing list 
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac [5] 
>  
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org [6] 
> ALAC Working Wiki: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL 
> AC[7]) 
>  
>  
>  
> Links: 
> ------ 
> [1] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg 
> e-lists.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Falac[2] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atl 
> arge.icann.org[3] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcommun 
> ity.icann.org%2Fdisplay%2Fatlarge%2FAt-Large%2BAdvisory%2BCommittee%2B%28AL 
> AC[4] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gih 
> .com%2Focl.html[5] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg 
> e-lists.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Falac[6] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atl 
> arge.icann.org[7] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcommun 
> ity.icann.org%2Fdisplay%2Fatlarge%2FAt-Large%2BAdvisory%2BCommittee%2B%28AL 
> AC 
>  
 


More information about the ALAC mailing list