[ALAC] CONSENSUS CALL Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

León Felipe Sánchez Ambía leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
Thu Sep 25 15:02:04 UTC 2014


Thank you Olivier. No objection on my side and agree to support the joint statement.

Best regards,

León
El 25/09/2014, a las 08:21, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> escribió:

> Repeated with the Subject - CONSENSUS CALL so as to make it stand out.
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [ALAC] Fwd: RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's
> Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan
> Date: 	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:08:39 +0200
> From: 	Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> To: 	alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> CC: 	staff >> ICANN AtLarge Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> 
> 
> 
> Dear ALAC members,
> 
> I am following up on my message below which included the Registry
> Stakeholder Group's Statement on the topic of the "enhancing ICANN
> Accountability" plan.
> 
> The ALT discussed the matter yesterday and was reminded that according
> to our ALAC Rules of Procedure, the ALAC Chair would be able to make a
> decision and respond to a process without an ALAC vote, asking for the
> ratification vote to take place afterwards.
> Historically, on occasions, we have sometimes also sent Statements to
> public comment periods prior to official ratification by the ALAC
> provided we knew there was consensus on the Statement.
> 
> With the Registry's Statement being considered, it was the feeling of
> the ALT that the ALAC should have no objection in supporting such a
> Statement, for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. The Statement contains no points which are contrary to an ALAC position.
> 2. With the amount of time remaining (closing date Saturday 27 September
> 2014) the Statement is more complete that any Statement the ALAC could
> draft in such a short amount of time.
> 3. A Joint Statement from SOs, AC and SGs is likely to have much more
> impact than separate Statements from various communities. This has been
> shown already in the speed of the response to the prior joint Statement
> which the ALAC has signed on.
> 4. at a time when all lights are on ICANN, showing alignment of the
> Community means we can work better and across silos - a good showcase of
> the multi-stakeholder model.
> 
> I would therefore ask you all for a 24H consensus call now starting at
> 13:00 UTC and ending on Friday 26 September 2014 at 13:00 UTC. Should I
> receive no formal objection to the ALAC supporting this Statement, I
> shall proceed forward with offering the ALAC's support for the
> Statement. Shortly after Friday, Staff will launch a standard
> ratification vote for the support of the Statement.
> 
> If there are objections to the Statement being supported by the ALAC, I
> plan to offer my individual support to it. For your comfort, please find
> a copy of the proposed Statement attached again to this message.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
> ALAC Chair
> 
> On 24/09/2014 18:02, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> Dear ALAC members,
>> 
>> please be so kind to find the suggested joint Statement from the
>> Registry Stakeholder Group. (attached as a docx and PDF)
>> Feedback needed as soon as possible. The ALT will be discussing this in
>> a few hours.
>> Kindest regards,
>> 
>> Olivier
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	RE: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN
>> Accountabitliy Plan
>> Date: 	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:48:10 +0000
>> From: 	Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
>> To: 	SO/AC/SG/C Chairs
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Following up my earlier email, I’ve attached the latest draft of the
>> RySG comments on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Feel free to share these with your respective groups if you find them
>> helpful.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please respond to this message with any updates from your respective
>> groups. Are you planning to submit comments? Are you open to developing
>> a joint SO-AC-SG-C leaders’ statement?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Keith
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>> 
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> 
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <ICANN RySG Accountability Response v10 23 2014 Clean.docx><ICANN RySG Accountability Response v10 23 2014 Clean.pdf><Attached Message Part.txt>_______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)



More information about the ALAC mailing list