[ALAC] URGENT CONSENSUS CALL: IANA Stewardship CWG Face-to-Face meeting
fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Sun Oct 26 21:52:58 UTC 2014
Dear Alan, All,
I realize that I answered only to Alan.
My answer to both questions is YES.
In first place I would prefer that we can find a replacement from the same
region of the member of the group that cannot attend but if we don't have
qualified candidates from the same region, I will be fine with a qualified
candidate from a different region.
About the second question, I would prefer a consensus from ALAC members
about the name of person who replace the member who cannot attend. Then if
we cannot reach consensus, I think ALT should select the names of
Thanks Alan for raising this important issue.
2014-10-26 14:35 GMT-03:00 Vanda Scartezini <vanda at uol.com.br>:
> As demanded , here my options:
> CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person,
> regardless of region? YES
> CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for
> this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES
> Vanda Scartezini
> Polo Consultores Associados
> Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
> 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
> Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
> Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
> Sorry for any typos.
> On 10/25/14, 16:38, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com> wrote:
> >CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person,
> >regardless of region? YES or NO
> >CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for
> >this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
More information about the ALAC