[ALAC] [IANA-issues] TR: [Accountability-dt] For review - Final Version of Enhancing ICANN Accountability CWG Charter

[Alberto Soto]

Dear, this is the opinion of LACRALO:

 

We agree with what Vanda has pointed out. Particularly, we suggest to follow
the advise of adding one sentence to the chapter procedures.

 

In this respect, we support the suggestion already done. This means:

 

" Add to any criteria under consideration an impact analysis on the
efficiency, efficacy and costs related to substantives processes that ICANN
shall be transparent and accountable to its community"

 

Kind regards

 

Alberto Soto

 

 

 

De: iana-issues-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:iana-issues-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Tijani BEN
JEMAA
Enviado el: lunes, 03 de noviembre de 2014 11:06 a.m.
Para: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; iana-issues at atlarge-lists.icann.org;
'ALAC'
Asunto: Re: [IANA-issues] [ALAC] TR: [Accountability-dt] For review - Final
Version of Enhancing ICANN Accountability CWG Charter

 

Hi Olivier,

 

I don’t think it is a good idea to have people appointed member of CWG and
the CCWG simultaneously. But I believe that no other restriction should be
made (any participant in the CWG can be member or participant in the CCWG).

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

 

 

 

 

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com] 
Envoyé : lundi 3 novembre 2014 14:47
À : tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn> ;
iana-issues at atlarge-lists.icann.org
<mailto:iana-issues at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; 'ALAC'
Cc : 'ICANN At-Large Staff'
Objet : Re: [ALAC] TR: [Accountability-dt] For review - Final Version of
Enhancing ICANN Accountability CWG Charter

 

Thank you Tijani; so if I understand correctly, the ALAC will soon need

to furnish up to 5 names (I would recommend a balance across all 5

regions) to be a member of the CCWG.

 

In your opinion, would it be preferable if the members already be

members or participants in the the IANA Naming Issues WG, or does this

not matter?

 

Kind regards,

 

Olivier

 

On 03/11/2014 14:33, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

> Dear All,

> 

>  

> 

> Please find attached a redline and clean version of the proposed Final

> Charter for the Enhancing ICANN Accountability CCWG.

> 

> This is the final draft from the CCWG drafting team after it's call of
today

> Monday 3 November 11:00 - 13:00  UTC. It will be submitted today at 20:00
to

> the chartering organizations for approval. So please, if you have any

> remark, send it as soon as possible so that the drafting team can modify
(if

> suggestion approved) the draft accordingly.

> 

>  

> 

>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----

> 

> Tijani BEN JEMAA

> 

> Executive Director

> 

> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

> 

> Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

> 

> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

> 

> Fax:       + 216 70 853 376

> 

>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

>  

> 

> 

 

  _____  


 <http://www.avast.com/> 

Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
parce que la protection Antivirus avast! <http://www.avast.com/>  est
active.