[ALAC] Public Comment on Board Liaison compensation
Wolf Ludwig
wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net
Tue May 27 21:42:06 UTC 2014
Thanks again, Alan! This is just to confirm that I support text and rational of your statement again.
Best, Wolf
Alan Greenberg wrote Tue, 27 May 2014 11:58:
>Regarding:
>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-compensation-2014-05-02-en
>
>As discussed on the ALAC call today, I will be posting the following
>statement (subject to minor editing) to the ICANN Public Comment.
>
>I encourage anyone who supports this to submit a comment to
><mailto:comments-bylaws-amend-compensation-02may14 at icann.org>Submit
>Comment to Forum. I also understand that the ALAC is itself may
>submit a statement as well (either support or a separate statement).
>
>------------------
>
>I am a member of the ALAC and the ALAC Liaison to the GNSO, but I am
>making this comment purely in my own capacity.
>
>I believe that, subject to a number of related considerations, it is
>reasonable to compensate Board members, including Liaisons, and the
>level of compensation suggested is reasonable.
>
>I do note that in the name of simplification, the report suggests an
>increase for Board members who are not Board Committee Chairs by as
>much as 29%.
>
>However, the related considerations mentioned above, in my mind,
>cannot be ignored.
>
>- One of the reasons always sited for such compensation is that
>having no compensation limits the available candidates who will make
>themselves available for the ICANN Board. Given that there has never
>been an AC/SO seat vacant due to lack of candidates, there is often
>competition for such seats, and the Nominating Committee regularly
>says that it has had to make very difficult decisions in selecting
>Board members since there was a surplus of eminently qualified
>candidates, in the name of transparency and accountability, it would
>be good to see hard evidence of the rationale.
>
>- The introduction of Board compensation widened the gulf between
>Board members and other volunteers within ICANN. The proposed change
>widens that gulf further. There is no question that many Board
>members work very hard on behalf of ICANN, and that dedication eats
>into their other professional activities and personal life. However,
>the same can be said for many ICANN volunteers. There are many in the
>community who work equally hard and dedicate the same kind of hours
>as Board members. Indeed, it has been claimed that many in the
>community put in far more time and effort than some Board members. I
>believe that this claim is accurate.
>
>SO and AC Chairs have been identified as meeting the above levels of
>commitment, and indeed many or perhaps all do. However, there are
>others who do not receive the existing benefits given to Board
>members and AC/SO Chairs who also dedicate unending hours and effort to ICANN.
>
>Board and now Liaison compensation without any new consideration of
>the contributions of others denigrates the efforts of the rest of the
>ICANN volunteers. Such acknowledgment for non-Chairs need not be
>financial compensation - there are a host of other benefits that
>Board members get that other volunteers (and Chairs) would really appreciate.
>
>Although I understand the difficulty of identifying those who put
>Herculean efforts into ICANN from those who are lower level
>contributors, we cannot continue to widen the gulf between the
>privileged few and the rest of volunteers and expect there not to be
>repercussions.
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
EuroDIG Secretariat
http://www.eurodig.org/
mobile +41 79 204 83 87
Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
http://euralo.org
Profile on LinkedIn
http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig
More information about the ALAC
mailing list