[ALAC] [At-Large] Reference: ICC Ruling on Objections filed by the ALAC

Rinalia Abdul Rahim rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 06:15:42 UTC 2014


I generally agree with Alejandro (minus accusation of cheating), especially
on the need for analysis and drawing of lessons learned to benefit follow
up and future At-Large action.

A review of the process would be useful. For example, recommendations could
be made on whether the ICC panel should include more than 1 person and
whether some kind of briefing on the context of ICANN, its ecosystem and
processes should be incorporated as part of the panel preparation.

The review ideally should include the sub groups that worked on the
criteria for objections as well as the development of
arguments/substantiation.

Best regards,

Rinalia



More information about the ALAC mailing list