[ALAC] Response from the Board New gTLD Process Committee

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Tue Dec 23 15:10:55 UTC 2014


Well it was one of the many things from ATRT2 that they agreed to do:
respond to all advice from ACs.

Yes, it is a good sign.

On the issue itself, does the Board's response open the question of
making sure that policies related to PICs become part of the picket
fence consensus policy process?


On 21-Dec-14 23:50, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> This is great news, Alan.
> I look forward to a positive engagement with the Board on this, as you say
> an unprecedented move.
> - Evan
> On 21 December 2014 at 22:09, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>> I have received that attached message from the Board New gTLD Process
>> Committee in response to the advice we provided on Top Level Domains
>> related to highly regulated sectors.
>> To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that we have had such
>> a response to any Board advice and I find this extremely encouraging.
>> Alan
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

More information about the ALAC mailing list