[ALAC] Fwd: Correction: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community Applications

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

You know what -- you're right! I thought it was actually differently
worded because of its filename.
NGPC definitely confused. In any case, I have asked for a response on
the other Statement.
Kind regards,

Olivier

On 21/09/2013 19:07, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
> Olivier, 
>
> The attached file is exactly the same as the previous one
>
> Tijani
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Olivier MJ
> Crepin-Leblond
> Envoyé : samedi 21 septembre 2013 23:10
> À : ALAC Working List
> Objet : [ALAC] Fwd: Correction: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community
> Applications
>
> Dear ALAC,
>
> please be so kind to find attached the response from the Chair of the NGPC
> to my earlier reply.
> I have since replied that our Statement on "Community Expertise in Community
> Priority Evaluation" (AL-ALAC-ST-0813-03-00-EN) still stands and we look
> forward to a response from the NGPC on this matter.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Correction: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community
> Applications
> Date: 	Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:40:39 -0700
> From: 	Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@*.org>
> To: 	Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@*.com>
>
>
>
> Dear Olivier,
> Please ignore the previous email.  I sent you the wrong attachment.    
> Please find attached the correct response from the NGPC.
> Thanks
> Cherine
>
> From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
> Date: Saturday, 21 September 2013 14:24
> To: Cherine Mohsen Chalaby <cherine.chalaby at icann.org
> <mailto:cherine.chalaby at icann.org>>
> Cc: Steve Crocker <Steve at shinkuro.com <mailto:Steve at shinkuro.com>>,
> Secretary <secretary at icann.org <mailto:secretary at icann.org>>, ICANN At-Large
> Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>>, Olivier MJ
> Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
> Subject: Re: Response to the ALAC Statements on Community Applications
>
> Dear Cherine,
>
> thank you very much for your kind reply which I will forward to the ALAC for
> their information.
>
> I should point out that the NGPC might be confused in their response
> regarding (1) "Community Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation"
> (AL-ALAC-ST-0813-03-00-EN). This Statement, attached, was actually sent to
> you and the NGPC. It was not sent to the Panel Firm.
>
> The Statement which the ALAC has sent to the Panel Firm is another Statement
> entitled "ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation
> (CPE) Guidelines Update from ICANN" (AL-ALAC-ST-0913-01-00-EN). I enclose a
> copy of it here for your information - and you will notice it looks at the
> subject from an entirely different angle.
>
> On behalf of the ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee, we look forward to the
> NGPC's response on the ALAC's "Community Expertise in Community Priority
> Evaluation" Statement.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
> ALAC Chair
>
>
> On 21/09/2013 08:29, Cherine Chalaby wrote:
>> Dear Olivier,
>>
>>  
>>
>> On behalf of the New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC), I thank you for 
>> providing the two recent ALAC Statements regarding:  (1) Community 
>> Expertise in Community Priority Evaluation; and (2) Preferential 
>> Treatment for Community Applications in String Contention.  The NGPC 
>> appreciates the attention the ALAC has given to these two topics and 
>> has reviewed the statements carefully.  The NGPC understands that 
>> additional detail regarding these topics may be sent to it in the near 
>> future.
>>
>>
>> Please find attached the full response of the NGPC to the ALAC Statements.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Cherine
>
>
>
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html