[ALAC] Minority statement for the IGO-INGO identifier protection PDP Final Report

[Alan Greenberg]

I have replaced the sentence in question with:

>The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong 
>support, taken as a whole, do not form a cohesive and consistent set 
>of policies. Although each individual Recommendation received 
>sufficient support, the net result is a set of Recommendations may 
>be incomplete and perhaps even conflicting.

and a footnote:

>As an example, there may be cases where a strong protection is not 
>recommended, but the recommendations may be silent on weaker forms 
>of protection.


aLAN



At 13/11/2013 09:38 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>Since these are modifications for clarity, I'll suggest one more. 
>One bothered me and I now have a better idea how to express what it was.
>
>"If the Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support were 
>implemented, there is no assurance that they form a cohesive and 
>consistent set of policies."
>
>I recall this statement being questioned by members of the working 
>group, for it is difficult to parse. What I believe it intended is 
>that the selection of resolutions that achieved Consensus are not 
>together reflective of a single approach to the issue, and in some 
>cases the statements that apparently have Consensus even seem to 
>contradict each other.
>
>In light of this, I suggest this re-working of the line that is 
>clearer and more direct to the point.
>
>"The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong 
>support, taken as a whole, do not form a cohesive and consistent set 
>of policies"
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>- Evan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ALAC Minority Statement-v04.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 66850 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20131114/831874a1/ALACMinorityStatement-v04.pdf>