[ALAC] [APAC-Discuss] Summary of RALO advice to the ALAC regarding the 5 objection statements to new gTLD applications

Evan Leibovitch evan at telly.org
Thu Mar 7 22:34:14 UTC 2013


Agreed.

Regardless of your stance on the validity of the objections, Dev and his
review team have done exemplary work in creating a process that has been,
thorough, transparent and timely.

They are to be commended, and offer a valuable lesson on how to do similar
activities in the future.

- Evan (via mobile)
On 2013-03-07 3:56 PM, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Dev,
>
> Thank you for the notification and the ongoing work.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Sala
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD
> > application, (see one page PDF at
> > http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD ),
> > RALOs have submitted advice to the ALAC on the objection statements on
> > community grounds to 5 new gTLD applications.
> > These objection statements were prepared by the gTLD Review Group
> > (gTLD RG) based on the outcomes of its review and discussion
> > of comments received by February 8, 2013 (see
> > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/2013q1/009493.html)
> >
> > The 5 applications and objection statements, including the comments
> > received by the gTLD RG on the applications
> > can be found on the workspace at https://community.icann.org/x/soxwAg
> > with 5 separate wiki pages for
> > each new gTLD application, the objection statement and the comments
> > received by the gTLD RG.
> >
> > The RALO's advice to the ALAC were in the form of answers to the 5
> > questions listed at https://community.icann.org/x/t45wAg
> > with the possible answers of either
> > * Yes, support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC
> > against applicant,
> > * No, NOT support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC
> > against applicant OR
> > * Abstain
> >
> > Objection statements NOT supported by at least three RALOs will not be
> > considered by the ALAC.
> > For those objection statements that are supported by three or more
> > RALOs, the ALAC will decide whether to file such
> > objection statements to the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP)
> > before the end of the objection period on March 13, 2013.
> >
> > Summary of RALO advice:
> >
> > 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement by the
> > ALAC
> > against applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg)
> >
> > 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement by the
> > ALAC
> > against applicant "“Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg)
> >
> > 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement by the
> > ALAC
> > against applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg)
> >
> > 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement by the
> > ALAC
> > against applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (
> > https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg )
> >
> > 1 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement by
> > the ALAC support the filing
> > of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant "Stable Tone
> > Limited" for the ".健康" (jiankang) string
> >
> > Therefore, the ALAC will have to consider the filing of the objection
> > statement against:
> > - applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg)
> > - applicant "“Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg)
> > - applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
> > (https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg)
> > - applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (
> > https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg)
> >
> > As the objection statement against the applicant "Stable Tone Limited"
> > for the for the ".健康" (jiankang) string failed
> > to get RALO support, this statement will not be considered by the ALAC.
> >
> > An ALAC meeting to consider the advice by the RALOs is scheduled for
> > Friday March 8 2013
> > https://community.icann.org/x/8JNwAg
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> > gTLD RG chair
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > APAC-Discuss mailing list
> > APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
> >
> > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
> P.O. Box 17862
> Suva
> Fiji
>
> Twitter: @SalanietaT
> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> Tel: +679 3544828
> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)



More information about the ALAC mailing list