[ALAC] The ESADT, Board Seat 15 and voting

[Alan Greenberg]

Avri, to be clear, this was discussed - a lot. And decided. But like 
rights protection mechanisms, I guess those who do not like the 
outcome will raised the issue again.

At 13/01/2013 06:53 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

>Thanks for helping me to follow CLO's instructions.
>I have done as was requested.
>
>Then again, that might be the problem: I followed instructions for 
>close on 2 years to try and get the topic on the table regarding the 
>electorate but failed at every turn.  Maybe I failed because I was 
>following instructions.  Lessons learned.
>
>avri
>
>On 13 Jan 2013, at 17:46, Eduardo Diaz wrote:
>
> > Avri:
> >
> > Here is the link to the wiki page:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/rop-esadt
> >
> > -ed
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> > Dear Cheryl,
> >
> > I have to admit I have trouble finding all those appropriate 
> inside places for comment.  I would have thought this list was a 
> good as one could do.
> >
> > Despite my long experience at ICANN and my several year 
> experience in At-Large I still find the At-Large web+wiki space a labyrinth.
> >
> > Assuming I am still around if ever the Electorate is deemed 
> in-topic, I will bring it up again.  In fact, I am not sure I am 
> going to stop bringing it up in the interim, as I will consider a 
> Board seat selection that does not include a wider electorate, suspect at best.
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13 Jan 2013, at 15:08, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> >
> > > Avri,
> > >
> > > I suggest that at least putting a short note and the link to 
> this piece  in the comments space on several key wiki pages 
> relevant to this topic might be a good ideas as well (in the 
> general esadt space as well as the specific Selection of Board Seat 
> 15 one) so the this view and analysis is readily available when 
> eerily periodically review this topic (and not just now within the 
> overall RoP review process)
> > >
> > > On 14/01/2013 6:11 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just submitted a blog piece on my disappointment that we will 
> not be seeing a vote the next time ALAC selects someone for the ICANN Board.
> > >
> > > http://avri.doria.org/post/40444728591/letinternetusersvote
> > >
> > > avri
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ALAC mailing list
> > > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> > >
> > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > > ALAC Working Wiki: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential 
> and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of 
> the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you 
> have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and 
> delete this message immediately.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)