[ALAC] Draft Statement on the questions from IGO/INGO PDP WG

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Jan 7 22:46:43 UTC 2013


Thanks on both counts. Typo fixed.  Alan

At 07/01/2013 04:01 PM, Eduardo Diaz wrote:
>I have read the document and agree with it.
>
>By the way, there is a small typo in the last sentence in question 4. It
>should be "the" ALAC is particularly...".
>
>-ed
>
>On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Carlton Samuels
><carlton.samuels at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > I read the submissions in their entirety.  So far as I see, they conform to
> > previously public positions taken by the ALAC in context, all of which had
> > my support.  My positions remain, unchanged.
> >
> > I do not think these positions require a formal vote.
> >
> > -Carlton
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > The PDP WG on special protection for IGO/INGO names has requested that
> > ACs
> > > and SOs submit comments on a number of questions related to special
> > > protections of IGO/INGO names.
> > >
> > > Evan and I were asked to draft a statement for the consideration and
> > > possible approval of the ALAC and it can be found at
> > > https://community.icann.org/x/**5IFQAg<
> > https://community.icann.org/x/5IFQAg>.
> > > Input was requested to be submitted by 08 January 2013, but there should
> > be
> > > no problem with getting it in a bit later.
> > >
> > > Evan is travelling at the moment, but his contributions were substantive
> > > and the document has his support. We both believe that it conforms well
> > to
> > > positions previously taken by the ALAC.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if Olivier wants to subject this statement to a formal ALAC
> > > vote. In my mind, it does not need a formal vote, but we do need to
> > ensure
> > > that it (or what it gets revised to) does conform to general ALAC
> > feelings.
> > > So please post your comments to the Wiki.
> > >
> > > A copy is attached here for your convenience.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ALAC mailing list
> > > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> > >
> > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > > ALAC Working Wiki:
> > >
> > 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki:
> > 
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> >
>
>
>
>--
>*NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
>subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
>addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
>disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
>mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)




More information about the ALAC mailing list