[ALAC] Closed generic statement
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Thu Feb 28 15:53:41 UTC 2013
On 28 Feb 2013, at 15:04, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Do you have any specific
> wording recommendations to change it to make it clearer or
> more self-consistent?
>
> In response to your comments, I would suggest that the opening
> sentence read "On the whole, the ALAC does not believe that unlimited
> closed generics provide public benefit."
How about:
"On the whole, the ALAC cannot determine whether an unlimited closed generics provide public benefits."
Though even this seems exaggerated.
Why are we talking about unlimited closed generics.
I thought we were talking about a very finite number.
In fact a relatively small number.
Has ALAC really determined that a small number of closed generics are not in the public interest?
How was this determined? If indeed it was determined, we should describe how?
Perhaps a truer statement might be:
The current belief of some in ALAC is that the small number of closed generics may not be in the public interest.
avri
More information about the ALAC
mailing list