[ALAC] Voting infrastructure rules

[Fatima Cambronero]

+1 Dev



2013/1/31 Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>

> At 31/01/2013 06:14 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
> >Comments inline
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Alan Greenberg
> ><alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> > > In my mind, it is essential that we see who has voted and who has not.
> That
> > > allows regional people to make sure their ALAC members vote.
> >
> >It *is* essential. Absolutely. And that information is (and should be)
> >published AFTER the voting period has concluded. Not during the vote.
>
> You missed my point. This gives ALAC members an incentive to vote,
> and more important, it allows their regional colleagues to remind
> them when they have not done so.
>
> And when the vote is being proposed by someone (as many have by me),
> it allows that person to nudge ALAC members to ensure that the vote
> is as complete as possible, and the result gives a strong message
> from the ALAC.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



-- 
*Fatima Cambronero*
Abogada-Argentina

Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
Twitter: @facambronero
Skype: fatima.cambronero

*Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:*
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

*Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:*
http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/

*Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/