[ALAC] Community Priority Evaluation Update from ICANN

Rinalia Abdul Rahim rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 13:41:50 UTC 2013

This solution is fine with me, but I request that you share with the ALAC
the articulation of the questions that you will pose/raise as follow up
with the board. The issues raised in the statements to the board did not
address all the issues raised in this thread.

 On Aug 21, 2013 9:30 PM, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Dear Rinalia,
> thanks for your follow-up.
> On 21/08/2013 14:24, Rinalia Abdul Rahim wrote:
> >
> > 1. Raise questions about the process and criteria that led to the
> > appointment of the EIU. JJS has flagged some of the key questions.
> >
> I have asked Staff to raise this internally and am awaiting a reply.
> >
> > 2. Raise questions about how ICANN will ensure that EIU will have
> > appropriate community expertise among its cadre of evaluators and what
> > kind of training they will have that provides community
> > orientation/sensitivity. Carlton has flagged some of the questions.
> >
> This was already raised in a Statement we have sent to the Board and the
> Board newgTLD Committee with both Chairs acknowledging receipt of the
> Statement and promising a further reply soon.
> >
> > Happy to draft something for the ALAC's consideration.
> >
> Well I am not too sure about what further Statement to send out. Staff
> should provide me with a confirmation of the votes today and I'll
> follow-up with the Chairs of the Board and the Board new gTLD Committee,
> providing them with the ALAC's vote counts. I will take this opportunity
> to ask specifically about the EIU question which we have raised. If you
> believe I should raise any other question along this line, please let me
> know ASAP so I'll integrate it in my email.
> Kind regards,
> Olivier

More information about the ALAC mailing list