[ALAC] [council] Message from Kurt Pritz

[Carlton Samuels]

+1.

Just so's you know Avri, ALAC retains the right - and has previously
exercised it - to reject/ignore a  GNSO finding.

I telegraph my own position in this case; summary rejection.

- Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
> On 10 May 2012, at 08:28, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > JAS: ALAC and GNSO Council agreed that JAS group
> > could continue to work on implementation. JAS
> > group is doing that and had now made an explicit
> > recommendation that a "Son of JAS" be involved in
> > carrying out implementation. If the GNSO Council
> > desires, that recommendation can go to the GNSO
> > COuncil instead of being implemented immediately.
>
>
> And why should the g-council be the one to decide this?
> Would it not be enough for ALAC, as the other chartering organization to
> approve it?
>
> Why does it even need approval at all.  It is obvious that one power the
> ICANN Staff has, and should have, is the ability to bring in advisors on
> any process.  If they wish to use JAS experienced advisors in the
> implementations and deployment of a plan suggested by JAS, who is the
> g-council to tell them they can't?
>
>
> avri
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>