[ALAC] [council] Message from Kurt Pritz
carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Thu May 10 15:36:45 UTC 2012
Just so's you know Avri, ALAC retains the right - and has previously
exercised it - to reject/ignore a GNSO finding.
I telegraph my own position in this case; summary rejection.
Carlton A Samuels
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> On 10 May 2012, at 08:28, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > JAS: ALAC and GNSO Council agreed that JAS group
> > could continue to work on implementation. JAS
> > group is doing that and had now made an explicit
> > recommendation that a "Son of JAS" be involved in
> > carrying out implementation. If the GNSO Council
> > desires, that recommendation can go to the GNSO
> > COuncil instead of being implemented immediately.
> And why should the g-council be the one to decide this?
> Would it not be enough for ALAC, as the other chartering organization to
> approve it?
> Why does it even need approval at all. It is obvious that one power the
> ICANN Staff has, and should have, is the ability to bring in advisors on
> any process. If they wish to use JAS experienced advisors in the
> implementations and deployment of a plan suggested by JAS, who is the
> g-council to tell them they can't?
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
More information about the ALAC