[ALAC] Fwd: Call for volunteers - 'thick' Whois PDP Drafting Team
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Jul 23 22:37:24 UTC 2012
Following is a Call for Volunteers for a Drafting
Team to craft the charter for the Thick Whois PDP.
This is the PDP with the original intent of
investigating a thick Whois for the Verisign
managed TLDs. However, the Issue Report (link
below) would also allow the PDP to address wider
issues. The ALAC statement on the Preliminary
Issue Report
(http://www.atlarge.icann.org/correspondence/statement-prelim-issue-report-on-thick-whois-30dec11-en.pdf)
expressed concern that if the PDP had too wide a
scope, it could be derailed trying to address far
wider (and complex) Whois questions. There are
also those who would like to see the PDP address
whether all other TLDs should adopt the thin Whois model.
I encourage all who have an interest in this
subject and are willing to do their homework
reading the documents listed below to volunteer.
Please distribute to those who may be good
volunteers within your regions as well.
Note that this is not the PDP WG which will form
once the charter is adopted by the GNSO, but
working on this DT will provide a good background for the PDP WG.
Alan
>From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
>To: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:06:24 -0700
>Subject: [council] Call for volunteers - 'thick' Whois PDP Drafting Team
>
>Call for Volunteers for Drafting Team to develop
>Charter for thick Whois PDP WG
>
>Introduction
>
>At its meeting on 14 March 2012, the GNSO
>Council initiated a Policy Development Process
>(PDP) on thick Whois (see
><http://gnso.icann.org/en/resolutions#20120314-1>http://gnso.icann.org/en/resolutions#20120314-1).
>Following a short delay, the GNSO Council
>decided at its last meeting that a group of
>volunteers should now be convened to draft the
>charter for the PDP Working Group, which is to
>be approved by the GNSO Council.
>
>Task of the Drafting Team
>
>The Drafting Team will be tasked with developing
>a charter for the PDP Working Group on thick
>Whois. The elements of the Charter should
>include, at a minimum, the following elements as
>specified in the
><http://gnso.icann.org/council/summary-gnso-wg-guidelines-06apr11-en.pdf>GNSO
>Working Group Guidelines: Working Group
>identification; Mission, Purpose and
>Deliverables; Formation, Staffing and
>Organization, and; Rules of Engagement. The
>proposed charter will be submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
>
>Volunteers
>
>If you are interested to participate, please
>send an email to the GNSO Secretariat
>(<mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>You will be required to complete a Statement of
>Interest in order to participate.
>
>Background Information on the Issue
>
>For the generic top-level domain (gTLD)
>registries, ICANN specifies Whois service
>requirements through the registry agreements
>(ICANN 2009 Registry Agreements) and the
>Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA).
>Registries satisfy their Whois obligations using
>different services. The two common models are
>often characterized as thin and thick Whois
>registries. This distinction is based on how two
>distinct sets of data are managed. One set of
>data is associated with the domain name, and a
>second set of data is associated with the
>registrant of the domain name. A thin registry
>only stores and manages the information
>associated with the domain name. This set
>includes data sufficient to identify the
>sponsoring registrar, status of the
>registration, creation and expiration dates for
>each registration, name server data, the last
>time the record was updated in its Whois data
>store, and the URL for the registrars Whois
>service. With thin registries, Registrars manage
>the second set of data associated with the
>registrant of the domain and provide it via
>their own Whois services, as required by Section
>3.3 of the RAA 3.3 for those domains they
>sponsor. COM and NET are examples of thin
>registries. Thick registries maintain and
>provide both sets of data (domain name and
>registrant) via Whois. INFO and BIZ are examples of thick registries.
>
>The GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on
>thick Whois at its meeting on 22 September
>2011 noting that the Issue Report should not
>only consider a possible requirement of 'thick'
>WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs in the context of
>IRTP, but should also consider any other
>positive and/or negative effects that are likely
>to occur outside of IRTP that would need to be
>taken into account when deciding whether a
>requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent
>gTLDs would be desirable or not.
>
>The Final Issue Report was submitted by ICANN
>Staff on 2 February 2012 (see
><http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en.pdf>http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en.pdf)
>and in this report a number of issues are
>outlined that will need further consideration
>should a PDP proceed. The staff recommendation
>notes that staff has confirmed that the proposed
>issues are within the scope of the ICANN policy
>process and the GNSO and notes that it is
>reasonable from the staffs perspective to
>expect that further investigation of thick
>Whois for all gTLDs would be beneficial to the
>community generally, as it would allow for an
>informed decision by the GNSO Council as to
>whether thick Whois for all gTLDs should be required or not.
>
>Recommended Reading for Volunteers
>
> * Final Issue Report on Thick Whois
> (<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en.pdf>http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/final-report-thick-whois-02feb12-en.pdf)
>
> * GNSO Working Group Guidelines, including
> charter guidelines
> (<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf>http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf)
>
>
>
>
>
>Glen de Saint Géry
>GNSO Secretariat
><mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list