[ALAC] ICANN Board resolutions from 8 Dec 2011
william.drake at uzh.ch
Tue Dec 13 08:48:31 UTC 2011
NCUC and I believe NCSG would support a joint letter to the board expressing our shared concerns about the funding limitations, albeit preferably sans references to be disgusted etc.
Shall we constitute a drafting team?
On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> I know we should be happy for even getting this far -- that ANY assistance
> is offered -- but I am disgusted at the opaqueness of the debate. The
> bottom up process, done as designed, has either been enthusiastically
> endorsed (ALAC, GAC, NCUC, NPOC -- all the public-interest constituencies)
> or passed without comment (the rest of GNSO). There has been no active
> argument presented against the recommendations. We have tried to anticipate
> objections in the JAS documentation yet have never been able to openly
> confront and respond to the opposition. It's a small victory for At-Large
> getting anything, but a major fail for ICANN's claims of
> policy-by-consensus and transparency.
More information about the ALAC