[ALAC] Draft ALAC statement on Draft Process for Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies
Sat Feb 19 12:23:43 UTC 2011
I thought my suggestion would avoid undue (or difficult to foresee)
delays, but will defer to your wisdom.
On 19/02/11 03:51, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>I'm not sure of the intent of that change though. Wouldn't it
>encourage dawdling at the start of a calendar year, and set
>unreasonable demands if the request goes to the Board right near the
>end of the year?
>At 19/02/2011 03:36 AM, Jean-Jacques SUBRENAT wrote:
>>thanks for the contribution. I agree with your analysis and suggestion.
>>- paragraph 6, your suggestion could be reinforced along the following
>>lines (my suggested addition in BOLD),
>>"... that the Board will review Constituency recognition issues within
>>meetings, whether Regular or Special, AND IN ANY CASE WITHIN THE RELEVANT
>>On 18/02/11 18:25, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> >I was asked to draft a statement on the Draft Process for Recognition
>> >of New GNSO Constituencies for the consideration of the ALAC. It is
>> >attached here.
>> >The details of the process and the comment period can be found at
>> >Comments are due by 04 March 2011.
>> >If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
>> >ALAC mailing list
>> >ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> >ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
More information about the ALAC