[ALAC] Draft ALAC statement on Draft Process for Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Feb 19 02:51:59 UTC 2011

Thanks Jean-Jacques,

I'm not sure of the intent of that change though. Wouldn't it 
encourage dawdling at the start of a calendar year, and set 
unreasonable demands if the request goes to the Board right near the 
end of the year?


At 19/02/2011 03:36 AM, Jean-Jacques SUBRENAT wrote:
>Dear Alan,
>thanks for the contribution. I agree with your analysis and suggestion. My
>- paragraph 6, your suggestion could be reinforced along the following
>lines (my suggested addition in BOLD),
>"... that the Board will review Constituency recognition issues within two
>meetings, whether Regular or Special, AND IN ANY CASE WITHIN THE RELEVANT
>On 18/02/11 18:25, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> >I was asked to draft a statement on the Draft Process for Recognition
> >of New GNSO Constituencies for the consideration of the ALAC. It is
> >attached here.
> >
> >The details of the process and the comment period can be found at
> >http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#newco-process-recognition.
> >Comments are due by 04 March 2011.
> >
> >If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
> >
> >Alan_______________________________________________
> >ALAC mailing list
> >ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> >At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> >ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac

More information about the ALAC mailing list