[ALAC] [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Fri Jan 14 17:05:18 UTC 2011
Eric, I haven't looked at the Redline and Blueline versions that you
are talking about, but there is no error (that I am aware of) in my
report of what was approved.
The IDN item was not in the WG's proposed charter (ie what Rafiq
proposed to Council). Debbie Hughes (I think) proposed an amendment
to add it. Cannot remember whether that was taken as friendly or
passed, but it doesn't really matter. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben proposed an
amendment to Jeff's new charter which included the IDN point. That
amendment did not pass, but ultimately that one item from it was
again proposed by Zahid Jaamil and was accepted as a friendly amendment.
At 14/01/2011 10:40 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>A question about the 2-up presentation of the charter texts.
>Looking at the original text, 1(i) read "Design mechanisms to
>encourage the build out of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) in
>small or underserved languages."
>In the Redline (Jeff Neuman's draft) version, 1(c) and 1(e), 1(f),
>1(g), 1(h) and 1(i) are absent, in addition to other changes.
>In the Blueline (Avri as formated by Wolf-Urich) version, 1(c) and
>1(e), 1(f), 1(g), 1(h) and 1(i) are present, in addition to other changes.
>What puzzles me is how 1(i), the item on IDNs, appears in your pdf,
>and in your textual commentary, absent from the column entitled
>"Original ALAC Charter" and present in the (narrowly approved) column
>entitled "New GNSO charter".
>Is this a error in transcription?
More information about the ALAC