[ALAC-LT] Tijani/Leon: Question on the Accountability CCWG Charter

Tijani BEN JEMAA tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn
Sat Nov 8 20:53:35 UTC 2014



No, the CCWG is one group that can mandate some of its members to work the
stream 1 and some others for stream 2, and then work together in the work
stream 2. Also, the CCWG can decide to work together the stream 1 and then
the stream 2. there is not a recommendation from the drafting team. The DT
didn’t put any restriction and it will be up to the CCWG to decide. 




Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376






-----Message d'origine-----
De : alac-excom-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-excom-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Alan
Envoyé : samedi 8 novembre 2014 18:44
Objet : [ALAC-LT] Tijani/Leon: Question on the Accountability CCWG Charter


Sorry, forgot to include Leon. Other part of question is that if the 

WG divides into two streams, WS1 people would be out of job in a 

short while - which again points to the 2nd meaning.




At 08/11/2014 01:26 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

>Tijani, on reviewing the charter, it is not clear if the intent is 

>that Work Stream 1 and Work Stream 2 will proceed in parallel, or 

>WS1 will be completed first, and then the focus will change to WS2.


>I would think that given the time constraints, it would be the 

>latter. But the term "work stream" implies the former.





ALAC-ExCom mailing list

ALAC-ExCom at atlarge-lists.icann.org


Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.

More information about the ALAC-ExCom mailing list