[ALAC-ExCom] Fwd: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone Report 2 - public comment?
langdonorr at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 19:04:06 UTC 2011
Hmmm in my view then having OCL ensure that the JAS-WG Co-Chairs email
GNSO & ALAC (via Chairs etc.,) raising THAT in the recent WG call it was
asked by staff if/when a PC is to be arranged for MS2 with that precedent
Then recognizing CO sensibilities being what they are... we have ensured the
WG has dotted its i's and crossed its t's and in my memory the last PC
just happened as a WG process we ALAC did NOT request it etc., it at
Maybe I missed something though, it may have been consequential on timing
with meetings etc., discussed as a process part in WG and so just
happened... and certainly occurred in the absence of realization of how GNSO
would later not endorse the MS1 of course...
On 8 June 2011 00:36, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
> This is insane.
> Even if it was just an ALAC-released document (which is what it is) it
> go up for PC. I don't know why the question is even asked, let alone why
> legal is getting involved.
> - Evan
> ALAC-ExCom mailing list
> ALAC-ExCom at atlarge-lists.icann.org
More information about the ALAC-ExCom