[ALAC-ExCom] Fwd: Draft 2 of e-mail to JAS WG Co-Chairs

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Apr 28 18:12:27 UTC 2011


ok with me.

Perhaps I missed part of the discussion, but is 
there some reason that the 6th was selected as 
opposed to perhaps the 10th, giving the WG an 
extra weekend and meeting, and still being 2 weeks prior to the ALAC meeting?

Alan

At 28/04/2011 01:29 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>Dear ALAC ExCom:
>
>Seth Green has very kindly worked on a first draft based on the
>discussions and action items of our 28/04/2011 ALAC ExCom single issue
>conference call. I have made a small number of amendments.
>Please review ASAP & email me your own amendments. I'll then email a
>copy to GNSO Council Chair to give him a headway and will then email the
>Co-Chairs of the WG, CC'ing GNSO Council Chair + Vice Chair, as well as
>the ALAC ExCom a couple of hours later.
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>_________________________________________
>
>
>Dear JASWG Co-Chairs,
>
>
>
>As one of the two chartering AC/SOs of the JASWG, the ALAC would like to
>offer certain recommendations, for your consideration, in order to boost
>the WG’s efforts efficiently forward at this point.  It is the ALAC’s
>hope that these recommendations will be taken in the spirit in which
>they are intended ­ as guidance rooted in the shared goal of having the
>JASWG fulfil its mandate within the agreed timetable.
>
>
>
>The ALAC recommends that the JASWG ­ starting with its meeting on
>Friday, 29 April ­ thoroughly review the “JASIssues and Recommendations”
>summary document (located at
>*https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations*),
>created by the JAS Drafting Team.   This document, once complete, will
>define and summarize the JAS WG’s consensus on a select number of
>important high-level issues, particularly:
>
>     *
>       The required criteria of applicants qualifying for support (i.e.
>       who can qualify); and
>     *
>       What these applicants can expect to get.
>
>These issues are covered in the document’s Parts 3 and 4, on which the
>ALAC recommends the WG most strongly focus. As per the WG's Charter,
>substantive outcome is sought particularly in these issues.
>
>
>
>The goal of this review would be to facilitate the JASWG’s discussion ­
>and resolution ­ of those aspects of this document that are still
>incomplete or for which there is still no clear WG consensus.  Please
>note that many of these unresolved issues are currently marked in red
>within the document.  We believe that the needed agreement on this small
>number of high-level issues can be reached /without/ the WG’s also
>having to agree, at this time, on the many underlying details it has
>been discussing.
>
>
>
>Specifically, the ALAC recommends that the JASWG go about the review of
>this document ­ and reaching agreement on the issues it covers ­ in the
>following way:
>
>
>
>     * This document review could be efficiently moderated by the JASWG
>       member most familiar with this document, Evan Leibovitch.
>     * The document should be displayed in the meeting’s Adobe Connect
>       Room so that all members are, quite literally, on the same page.
>     * The changes on which the JASWG agrees should be made to the
>       document during the discussion itself ­ that is, "in real time"
>       during the WG’s meeting.
>
>It is the ALAC’s hope that the JASWG, by focusing its work in this way
>immediately (as of its 29 April meeting), will be able to successfully
>reach a consensus on a number of fundamental issues in the few meetings
>it still has before the 6 May deadline for its report to its chartering
>organizations to be completed.
>
>
>
>I and other members of the ALAC Executive Committee would welcome the
>opportunity to discuss these suggestions with you further.
>
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC-ExCom mailing list
>ALAC-ExCom at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom





More information about the ALAC-ExCom mailing list