[ALAC-ExCom] TR: WG: AW: Summit Follow-up -- ALAC?

Cheryl Langdon-Orr cheryl at hovtek.com.au
Thu Jun 11 19:21:15 EDT 2009


Agreed sounds like an excellent table top breakfast topic to me :-)  and 
I like the continuity from our Mexico meal meeting as well...

CLO

Sébastien Bachollet wrote:
> Dear all,
> Please have a look to this exchange.
> I think it is a good point for any interaction with board members.
> All the best
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> Président d'honneur - Isoc France
> sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr
> www.egeni.org
> www.isoc.fr
>  
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de] 
> Envoyé : jeudi 11 juin 2009 09:48
> À : Adam Peake; sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr; Wolf Ludwig; Patrick Vande
> Walle
> Objet : AW: WG: AW: Summit Follow-up -- ALAC?
>
> I support fully Adams appraoch. The ALAC should send a formal
> resoluton/request to the Board so that there is a legal basis for
> interaction which would go beyond "small talk" and "nice words". AL has to
> buil on what it has achieved and this is good for ICANN as a whole in the
> stormy post JPA days. 
>  
> Wolfgang
>  
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: Adam Peake [mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp]
> Gesendet: Do 11.06.2009 08:50
> An: sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr; 'Wolf Ludwig'; 'Adam Peake'; 'Patrick Vande
> Walle'
> Cc: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
> Betreff: RE: WG: AW: Summit Follow-up -- ALAC?
>
>
>
> This be a good subject for us to discuss with the
> board. Sébastien, has the excom discussed issues
> we  will want the board to hear about?  Don't we
> usually prime them so the 2 or 3 members they
> send have some preparation?
>
> I would specifically ask them how have the Summit
> documents (recommendations, ideas, etc) have been
> received by the board, do they have comments or
> questions?  Have any comments been taken onboard
> in some way?
>
> I am not sure of other specific questions, but
> one should be about how the  Summit was a
> significant investment of resources for ICANN and
> At Large. How does the board see the work of the
> Summit continuing, do they recognize it as more
> than a one-off effort?
>
> I am quite keen to hear how the see the Summit
> and enlarged, more engaged at large as
> representative of the public interest in ICANN.
> And how if it the success of the Summit we build
> on, it could help ICANN in terms of
> representation and accountability to the notion
> of the public interest.  i.e. JPA related issues.
>
> I am sure there's a few more we could add.  Does this make sense?
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> At 9:09 PM +0200 6/10/09, Sébastien Bachollet wrote:
>   
>> https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?at_large_sydney_schedule
>> Sunday, 21 June 2009
>> ALAC & Regional Leadership Working Session 1
>> Time: 09:00 - 18:00 (Sydney Time)
>> Meeting Room: tbd
>> Post-Summit review and Reporting of At-Large working group activities (1015
>> - 1230)
>>
>> Sébastien Bachollet
>> Président d'honneur - Isoc France
>> sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr
>> www.egeni.org
>> www.isoc.fr
>>
>>
>>     
>>>  -----Message d'origine-----
>>>  De : Wolf Ludwig [mailto:wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net]
>>>  Envoyé : mercredi 10 juin 2009 20:00
>>>  À : Adam Peake; Sébastien Bachollet; Patrick Vande Walle
>>>  Cc : Wolfgang Kleinwächter
>>>  Objet : Re: WG: AW: Summit Follow-up -- ALAC?
>>>
>>>  Dear all,
>>>
>>>  I couldn't find any mentioning of a Summit Follow-up in
>>>  Sydney, as discussed at our last call, in the last ALAC meeting
>>>  minutes?
>>>
>>>  Best,
>>>  Wolf
>>>
>>>
>>>  Wolf Ludwig wrote Wed, 20 May 2009 18:48:
>>>  >Dear Adam, Sébastien, Patrick and all,
>>>  >
>>>  >as promised at the call, here a short summary on the suggested
>>>  >Summit Follow-up (as discussed with Wolfgang last week in
>>>  >Geneva) for Sydney ...
>>>  >
>>>  >It would be good if ALAC would formally ask the ICANN Board
>>>  >(if they are not responding "pro-actively" in the time between ;-)
>>>  >what they think about the recommendations in the Summit
>>>  >Declaration handed over to them at the closure of the Summit
>>>  >in Mexico.
>>>  >
>>>  >Some keywords for such an approach to be prepared for Sydney:
>>>  >The Summit preparation was a big effort by the ALAC community
>>>  >and conducted successfully, it was a considerable investment in
>>>  >terms of money for ICANN and it was not meant as a "single event"
>>>  >but rather more a continuing process for the community ...
>>>  >The statements and recommendations on the different work
>>>  >subjects would therefore need further consideration and validation
>>>  >by the ICANN Board ...
>>>  >
>>>  >If ALAC doesn't want to push this further, we could do it on behalf
>>>  >of EURALO - and I am almost certain to get some support from
>>>  >NARALO.
>>>  >
>>>  >Thanks for bringing this up next week at the ALAC call!
>>>  >
>>>  >Best,
>>>  >Wolf
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >Wolf Ludwig wrote  Do 14.05.2009 23:31:
>>>  >>Lieber Wolfgang,
>>>  >>
>>>  >>Auf dem Weg zur EBU haben wir noch kurz über den Summit
>>>  >>Follow-up gesprochen, und was denn nun aus der Declaration
>>>  >>(ausser geduldiges Papier und Ablage) würde. Da auch ich
>>>  >>diesbzgl. nicht viel Vertrauen in ALAC habe, habe ich diesen
>>>  >>Punkt auf die Agenda unseres nächsten EURALO calls -
>>>  >>ausnahmsweise erst am nächsten Mittwoch, 17:00 Uhr -
>>>  >>gesetzt. Werde dort eine gemeinsame Initiative mit NARALO
>>>  >>vorschlagen, weil ich dort ein ähnlich grosses Interesse
>>>       
>>  > >>vermute. Bin mit Dir einer Meinung, dass wir VOR Sydney eine
>>     
>>>  >>Erklärung formulieren (Summit war grosser Aufwand für ALAC,
>>>  >>auch ein Erfolg, hat ICANN eine Stange Geld gekostet und wird
>>>  >>erklärtermassen nicht als "single event", sondern als Prozess
>>>  >>verstanden ...) UND wir daher vom ICANN Board wissen wollen,
>>>  >>was er von unseren Resultaten und Empfehlungen hält?
>>>  >>
>>>  >>Da ich, wie gesagt, diesmal in Sydney nicht dabei sein kann,
>>>  >>müssen unsere ALAC-Vertreter das dann pushen - im Alleingang
>>>  >>oder mit NARALO -; doch bin ich gerne bereit, diesen Punkt mit
>>>  >>NARALO/Evan Leibovitch abzuklären und wahrscheinlich helfen
>>>  >>Adam, Du, Patrick oder Sébastien auch mit, eine solche Erklärung
>>>  >>zu draften, die wir dann bei unserem Juni-Call und vor dem
>>>  >>Aufbruch nach Sydney absegnen können. Vielleicht steigen dann
>>>  >>vor Ort noch andere RALOs oder gar ALAC in den rollenden Zug
>>>  >>ein?
>>>  >>
>>>  >>Soweit erstmal, wünsche Dir noch eine gute Zeit in Genf und
>>>  >>gute Rückreise.
>>>  >>
>>>  >>Herzlichen Gruss,
>>>  >>Wolf
>>>  >>
>>>  >>P. S. Habe einen Basis-Entwurf für einen EURALO-Flyer (wirklich
>>>  >>sehr basic ;-) formuliert, den wir nächsten Mittwoch diskutieren;
>>>  >>Kopie schon mal zur Info.
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>comunica-ch
>>>  >>phone +41 79 204 83 87
>>>  >>Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
>>>  >>www.comunica-ch.net
>>>  >>
>>>  >>Digitale Allmend
>>>  >>http://blog.allmend.ch <http://blog.allmend.ch/>
>>>       
> <http://blog.allmend.ch/>  -
>   
>>>  >>
>>>  >>EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
>>>  >>http://euralo.org <http://euralo.org/>  <http://euralo.org/>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >>
>>>  >
>>>  >comunica-ch
>>>  >phone +41 79 204 83 87
>>>  >Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
>>>  >www.comunica-ch.net
>>>  >
>>>  >Digitale Allmend
>>>  >http://blog.allmend.ch <http://blog.allmend.ch/>  -
>>>  >
>>>  >EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
>>>  >http://euralo.org <http://euralo.org/> 
>>>  >
>>>
>>>  comunica-ch
>>>  phone +41 79 204 83 87
>>>  Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
>>>  www.comunica-ch.net
>>>
>>>  Digitale Allmend
>>>  http://blog.allmend.ch <http://blog.allmend.ch/>  -
>>>
>>>  EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
>>>  http://euralo.org <http://euralo.org/> 
>>>       
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-ExCom mailing list
> ALAC-ExCom at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>
>   



More information about the ALAC-ExCom mailing list